Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Kennedy's Death Penalty Opinion Cites "World Opinion" and International "Amicus" Briefs
US Supreme Court ^ | 3/1/05 | Justice Kennedy

Posted on 03/01/2005 8:49:19 AM PST by crushkerry

Go to pages 21-25 of the Opinion (can't post the text here) and read Justice Kennedy's opinion on how we need to take into account world opinion and how the Court should look to "the leading members of the European Community" in deciding on some cases. If you never thought Judges were important, you should now. (This doesn't apply to most Freepers.

If anyone could find a way to print Pages 21-25 of the Opinion, in which Kennedy discusses the topic please copy it. Thanks


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: crushkerry

This is disgusting. Is it possible to remove SC jusdges for admitted denial of the US Constitution. In fact applying foreign laws to United States Citizens.


41 posted on 03/01/2005 9:35:35 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
When discussing a novel issue of law, courts can look at arguments from pretty much anywhere.

Yes, we can all look forward to the time when the Justices recite from the Koran.

42 posted on 03/01/2005 9:36:55 AM PST by elbucko (Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

The external pressure of this court's decision on Bush v. Gore is now fully exposed.
There is no way Kennedy would sign onto that decision today, he'd find a Norweigian decision to help his sway his view.


43 posted on 03/01/2005 9:37:36 AM PST by WoodstockCat (W2 !!! Four more Years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
I cant believe Reagan appointed Kennedy and Oconner.

Shows what happens when you appoint someone just because of their gender, and someone to please Ted Kennedy.

44 posted on 03/01/2005 9:41:29 AM PST by M 91 u2 K (Kahane was Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
Time for Impeachment Hearings!
45 posted on 03/01/2005 9:41:45 AM PST by KoRn (~Halliburton Told Me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76; holdonnow; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie
I want my county back from these arrogant black robed bostirds! This is wrong on it's face... prima facia, as they say!!!

What? Did these lawyers think the Declaration of Independence came from the Old Testament books of "Judges?" The "Three Legged Milkstool" has now been toppled and "The People" must repair it!!!

46 posted on 03/01/2005 9:44:49 AM PST by SierraWasp (The Dems have lost whatever "redeeming social value" they ever had!!! Just ask Zell...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Well, there were four other Republicans who voted against him -- Packwood (OR), Chafee (RI), Stafford (VT), and Warner (VA).


47 posted on 03/01/2005 9:46:46 AM PST by mdwakeup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
This is a court that reflects in measure the "New World Order" the Bushes, father and son have desired and facilitated.

Refresh my recollection. Which Supreme Court Justice was appointed by George W. Bush?

48 posted on 03/01/2005 9:47:32 AM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Frank_2001

And I agree with you.

It's time for Congress to step in and stop this crap. Way pass the time.

This just infuriates the hell out of me.


49 posted on 03/01/2005 9:48:29 AM PST by KimmyJaye (Susan Estrich: A face for radio and a voice for pantomime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
The offended states that have the death penalty for 18 or under should ignore the Court. It is time. They have to have the gonads to tell the Court that they have just violated the Constitutional right of States rights. This is serious. The Court is out of control. If need be, the Senate must get involved and they have the power to reverse the Court by a simple majority by passing a bill.
50 posted on 03/01/2005 9:51:34 AM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

bbttt file under judicial tyranny


51 posted on 03/01/2005 9:51:34 AM PST by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

The Constitution was written because the Founding Fathers found that the existing laws of the Europeans were not tho their liking. Now we're supposed to turn the them to interpret it?


52 posted on 03/01/2005 9:53:27 AM PST by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats; Congressman Billybob

The majority opinion is sickening. If there's one "litmus test" Bush should apply in nominating justices, its that they do not believe that foreign jurisprudence has any proper role in the interpretation of our Constitution.


53 posted on 03/01/2005 9:56:15 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: siunevada

A few conservatives tried to do this with a law to protect marriage from the likes of Kennedy and his Sodomite pals. Our fearless Republican senators, under the courageous leadership of Bill Frist, let it die. Thus the Gramscian Republicans continue the long march to the left.

Frist's choice for the Senate Judiciary, Arlen Specter, along with his Marxist legal staff, will be the gatekeepers for all nominees to the Supreme Court - assuring that only those judges who share the views of Souter, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Stevens, Bryer, and Kennedys will be approved. Next time they're campaigning, Frist and the gang will talk up the need to re-elect them so they can "fix" the Supreme Court. Nice scam.


54 posted on 03/01/2005 9:59:27 AM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
"The opinion of the world community, while not controlling our outcome, does provide respected and significant confirmation of our own conclusions."
55 posted on 03/01/2005 10:04:56 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Would it be un-friggin believeable if they took into account, say, The Ten Commandmants?


56 posted on 03/01/2005 10:07:11 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: crushkerry
I blame the Congress which, under the Constitution, has the power to limit the jurisdiction of the Federal courts. They've simply abdicated that power, and now five unelected lawyers can impose their whims on the rest of us.
58 posted on 03/01/2005 10:19:16 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead

The most inexcusable, disgusting, inexplicable failure of any political party in American History has been the Republican Party’s failure to appoint Conservative Supreme Court justices when it had the chance too.
Without a fight they ceded control of this country to the left. The left has been able to rule this country from the bench for the last twenty years because of this travesty.
The only way the citizens have to address the abuses of the court is to elect Presidents who will appoint honest judges. Bush one, Ford and even Reagan betrayed the voters of this country.
I can never have an ounce of respect for Bush the elder. The damage he did by carelessly nominating Souter is incalculable. In many ways Clinton did less damage to this country in 8 years than Bush did with this criminally stupid nomination. (It is immaterial if he was 'mislead' it is his job not to be mislead.)
If the President or the Republican party surrender to the Democrats and nominate a "moderate" to the Supreme Court. They will never get my vote again. I have made it clear to my Republican Senator this fact also.


59 posted on 03/01/2005 10:20:05 AM PST by CameronNB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

.


60 posted on 03/01/2005 10:20:35 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson