Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc

So under your theory, who decides what is cruel and unusual punishment under the constituition?


515 posted on 03/01/2005 9:49:50 AM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras

The States decide. If there appear to be abuses due to changing public opinion or technology, the people of the State should change their laws. If the Nation feels the necessity to correct the action of a minority of the States, there should be an Amendment to the Constitution.

The Supreme Court should interpret the meaning of the Constitution, not engage in the equivalent of amending the Constitution.


538 posted on 03/01/2005 9:57:27 AM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]

To: Protagoras
So under your theory, who decides what is cruel and unusual punishment under the constituition?

Evidently it is not SCOTUS. They refused to hear the case of Terry Schiavo. Starving and dehydrating any person to death would fall under the rubrick of "cruel and unusual", no?

548 posted on 03/01/2005 10:04:39 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson