Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Protagoras
So under your theory, who decides what is cruel and unusual punishment under the constituition?

Evidently it is not SCOTUS. They refused to hear the case of Terry Schiavo. Starving and dehydrating any person to death would fall under the rubrick of "cruel and unusual", no?

548 posted on 03/01/2005 10:04:39 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
Starving and dehydrating any person to death would fall under the rubrick of "cruel and unusual", no?

Since the state was not doing that as some form of punishment for a crime, apparently they didn't think it was in the scope of their authority.

I think it's cruel and unusual way to die, but it's a stretch to say that she had been "sentenced' to it for a crime.

Word games like that don't interest me BTW.

567 posted on 03/01/2005 10:12:21 AM PST by Protagoras (" I believe that's the role of the federal government, to help people"...GWB, 7-23-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson