Thing is Terri would surely ask for a divorce from MS if she could knowing he is living with another women, and having children with her. Even if Terri was to get better Michael wouldn't stay with her. So, I think a judge should conclude that a divorce is granted because of Michael already being "married" to someone else!
A no-brainer...yep!
In many states, a husband living with another woman with whom he has 2 children would constiute grounds for automatic divorce. It's ridiculous and absurd.
Yeah, for all the phony talk from Michael Schiavo about what Terry's "wishes" would be, who can question or doubt that, with her husband living in open and notorious adultery, she would wish to divorce him? And, given the fact of the two children born into this adulterous relationship, I can't imagine any sane judge even entertaining the idea of the outcome being contested.
Really? And legally speaking, divorce by proxy is covered where? Show me the statute, or in the absence of a statute, precedence will work.
You better believe Terri would ASK FOR A DIVORCE under these circumstances. Has anyone TOLD HER that Michael is living with another woman?? I think she OUGHT TO BE TOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Common Law divorce? :)