Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fear and Loathing in the Press Room (He's Back)
jeffgannon.com ^

Posted on 02/26/2005 9:43:35 AM PST by TheOtherOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: McGavin999
Cheney

I thought she was open, but quiet about her life. Was she really outted?

21 posted on 02/26/2005 10:28:21 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user
This episode is so rich with irony that it will take me many columns and a book to deal with it all.

You didn't forget to donate did you? . . . or did you miss that page on the new JeffGannon.com.

I'll give him this...he's entertaining.

22 posted on 02/26/2005 10:30:59 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Boondock_Saint
Using "Fear and Loathing" in your title a fews days after HST passed is also tasteless.

The headline class was a whole nuther weekend of journalism school. Jeff had no time for that....his weekends were packed.

23 posted on 02/26/2005 10:33:08 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
It's high time to rid our country of the putrid partisans of the leftist media.

I don't know exactly how it can be done as they are so entrenched, but the future of America may depend on it.
24 posted on 02/26/2005 10:38:15 AM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

He doesn't deny the "salacious past". Wonder why not. It will be a cold day in hell before I'll jump to defend a gay prostitute, regardless of his politics.


25 posted on 02/26/2005 10:42:36 AM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeHu
They're not like the rest of us -- they're much more intelligent and were born to be con-artists.

They're much more INTELLIGENT???

That is one of the most ridiculous assertions I've ever read on this forum.
Patently, and demonstrably false.

26 posted on 02/26/2005 10:47:38 AM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I pray for conservatives to get aggressive and mean about it. It amazes me that people are piling on this Jeff Gannon while an old queen like Barney Franks still swishes down the halls of congress. If Gannon did prostitute himself, he wasn't doing it on the taxpayers dime, unlike Barney's friends and lovers.
27 posted on 02/26/2005 10:48:41 AM PST by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Maybe you should have just been accused of raping someone, say 20 years ago, and then the liberals would defend you at all cost. Will Clinton EVER be asked about Juanita?


28 posted on 02/26/2005 10:56:15 AM PST by Ron in Acreage (Kerry is (no longer) a threat to national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
You didn't forget to donate did you?

LOL! Yeah, my check's in the e-mail.

29 posted on 02/26/2005 11:04:57 AM PST by anonymous_user (Not everything's a conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

posted here, different title:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1350437/posts


30 posted on 02/26/2005 11:15:36 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne

Also see:

The Official Jeff Gannon Blog Post
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1351507/posts


31 posted on 02/26/2005 11:17:05 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
Glad to hear from you Jeff.
Congratulations for getting your life straightened out, and may you find grace to meet the challenges and tribulations you surely must face in the days ahead.

Not one of us is without sin, and I'd just like to remind everyone what Jesus said about the female prostitute.. "Let he that is without sin cast the first stone."

The woman was not stoned to death because not one person watching could say they were without sin.

And yes the dems demanding probes into the backgrounds of the reporters allowed in to see the president should be taken up on their demands. I guarantee however that the press will not like this once it happens to them.

Keep fighting the good fight!
32 posted on 02/26/2005 11:20:04 AM PST by no_apathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: TheOtherOne
I feel badly for my colleagues

Why? Faulty fingertips? Oh, I see - "journalists" don't have to use proper grammar any more, even homosexual, pseudonymous ones.

34 posted on 02/26/2005 11:22:30 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TeraWatt

BYE BYE


35 posted on 02/26/2005 11:23:44 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TeraWatt
Guckert/Gannon got what he deserved for both being a hustler of propanganda and for being a "hustler" - I would love to see who gave him his press credentials and how he got hired by the "Talon News Service" most likely by servicing both Rove and Eberle.

You are disturbed.

36 posted on 02/26/2005 11:25:17 AM PST by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Gays even bashed and outed Andrew Sullivan years ago when he had the integrity to discuss gay promiscuity. They will eat their own, pun intended.


37 posted on 02/26/2005 11:30:10 AM PST by dervish (Europe should pay for NATO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheOtherOne
but the bloggers were aiming for my total destruction.

This piece is a little too self-centered - - the aim of the attacks is not to smear "Jeff Gannon," but rather, to smear Republicans and the Bush White House. Gannon just makes for some handy ammo. He's just a pawn. In reality, the Democrat attack machine couldn't care less about Gannon. It is "total destruction" of Bush that they seek.

38 posted on 02/26/2005 11:30:21 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth

Well said. Gannon or whoever he is has become a synonym for the rabid left media being prepared to defend what is left of its turf, meaning the right to turn Democratic press conferences into love fests and Republican ones into verbal wars.

The guy is on our side. I hope he changes and repents of that lifestyle, and that eventually owns up to it better than he has so far, but he has still been wronged. Any other reporter with that same baggage would be lionized if they were of the Bolshevik/Democrat/Fascist perspective.

So I'm with him, with reservations, and I wouldn't touch any website of his with gloves on.


39 posted on 02/26/2005 11:31:37 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I see where five Democrats sent a letter to the White House to investigate this. Well for the Democrats to call for an investigation is like Al Capone calling on the FBI for help. Under Clinton the White House was turned into a Whore House. The likes of powerful Senator Leahy leaking classified information that caused several hundred of our overseas operatives to be murdered,the Kennedy drowning of Mary Jo Kopeckne,the Condit affair and the list goes on and on and for the Democrats to call something in Gannons background into question is quite ridiculous.
The Party of diversity is now wanting to out someone,they call black nominees and females "Neanderthals" the whole bunch should be hung.BR> In this day and time to be a Democrat you must be racist,two-faced and an outright shame. Any decent person calling them self Democrat needs to be analyzed. We all need to go to Gannons site and donate or hire him to investigate Congress and their shadowy dealings. Congress cant stand for any reporter not to be a loyal Democrat liberal and when is the last time someone in the press has scrutinized the Congress criiters outside of the hallowed halls. Congress and all reporters should be kept under the microscope all the time.
40 posted on 02/26/2005 11:38:19 AM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson