Skip to comments.
President Cheney?
The Weekly Standard ^
| 03/07/05
| Fred Barnes
Posted on 02/26/2005 6:55:39 AM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
1
posted on
02/26/2005 6:55:40 AM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
The main rap I've heard on Cheney is that he lacks the charisma to get elected. Are you kidding me? The main rap on Cheney is that he has a marginal circulatory system.
2
posted on
02/26/2005 6:59:28 AM PST
by
Huck
(I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
To: Pokey78
A Cheney candidacy will give the 'rats the vapors.
To: Pokey78
They know that gravitas trumps charisma in choosing a president in a foreign policy era.If true, Kerry who has neither would have collected only about the 30% or so of the Kool-Aid drinking popular vote, not 48%.
4
posted on
02/26/2005 7:00:03 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(crime would drop like a sprung trapdoor if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings)
To: Pokey78
I love Cheney (him and Rummy are our current times Marshall and Truman IMHO), but I do not believe he has the vigor and the physical stamina to run for President. He has served us with distinction, Fred, let him go fly fishing.
5
posted on
02/26/2005 7:01:00 AM PST
by
schu
To: Pokey78
Dick Cheney has spent nearly 40 years in public service. Aside from the time he put in at Halliburton, where he made something approaching his worth, he's lived on a relative pittance. How much do we want this man to sacrifice?
Go out and fish those streams Dick, spend some quality time with Lynn, play with the kids and grand kids. You've had a fine run and we could ask no more from you. Owl_Eagle
"You know, I'm going to start thanking
the woman who cleans the restroom in
the building I work in. I'm going to start
thinking of her as a human being"
-Hillary Clinton
(Yes, she really said that
Peggy Noonan
The Case Against Hillary Clinton, pg 55)
6
posted on
02/26/2005 7:01:14 AM PST
by
End Times Sentinel
(Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts. "Aww. not even a little?")
To: Pokey78
Cheney-Rice ticket in 2008?
7
posted on
02/26/2005 7:01:27 AM PST
by
Reagan is King
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
To: Owl_Eagle
To: schu
Yeah, as much as I admire Cheney, I don't see him running for '08.
9
posted on
02/26/2005 7:03:19 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Impetuous! Homeric!)
To: Reagan is King
I was hoping for Jasmin-Rice or perhaps Longgrain-Rice or maybe even Rice-Pilaf.
To: Pokey78
I think it would take a threat of monumental significance
for Cheney to be the nominee.
If something goes seriously wrong somewhere in the world
and we're drawn into a bitter conflict,
I could see Cheney as the only real choice...
not for political reasons, but for national survival ones.
11
posted on
02/26/2005 7:06:06 AM PST
by
Bobber58
(whatever it takes, for as long as it takes)
To: Pokey78
I don't know if I could stand another election where Halliburton is mentioned 24/7. Cheney would make a good president, I would love to see the liberals scream! :D
12
posted on
02/26/2005 7:06:09 AM PST
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com JUST UPDATED)
To: Pokey78
Fred Barnes is usually WAY too smart to have written this.
Cheney is not a well man.
Cheney will be 68 in 2008.
Cheney is very rich and does not need the money.
Cheney has absolutely NO interest in remaining in DC.
Cheney helped develop the foreign policy, but others were visable in publicly implementing it.
More than anything else, Dick Cheney is tired. Lynn Cheney is tired..... and they are smart enough to get out of DC while they can.
>What about John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Bill Frist, and other Republicans who are thinking about running?
McCain is our Howard Dean. Frist is a non-starter. Rudy, Romney and Rice are the front runners now against the Dems obvious selection of Hillary with Hispanic Bill Richardson as VP. (Yes, I know, Republicans hate her, but the radical wing of the Dems now in control love her.)
13
posted on
02/26/2005 7:07:54 AM PST
by
MindBender26
(Having your own XM177 E2 means never having to say you are sorry......)
To: Pokey78
fat white men are in low demand for any political office today due to the hollywoodization of politics.
governor wilson of california appointed a fat white man as u.s. senator and he lost the next election to a photogenic female democrat.
14
posted on
02/26/2005 7:08:02 AM PST
by
ken21
( warning: a blood bath when rehnquist, et al retire. >hang w dubya.< dems want 2 divide us.)
To: Pokey78
I have it on a good souce (DUmmieland) that Chenney is resigning next month and Condi is taking over.
To: Pokey78
... What about John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Bill Frist, and other Republicans who are thinking about running?...
Twenty per centers at best. The Hellbeast will devour them.
Cheney, on the other hand , is a real man. He could bring me back to the republican party.
If he chooses not to run, the GOP had better find a strong young horse, perhaps Mike Pence. I'm beginning to hear more of him and have heard nothing yet I couldn't support.
To: Bobber58
Cheney/Rice is the ace in the hole should things get dicier in the next three years.
Other than that it looks like some combination of Rice, Allen, or Romney.
And to continue the betting thought, www.tradesports.com has Cheney at 2.0 as the Rep. nominee, which is 20 cents a contract on a scale of $0.00 to $10.00.
17
posted on
02/26/2005 7:19:11 AM PST
by
angkor
To: Pokey78
Only two sitting presidents have seen their running-mate vice presidents elected to succeed them - Andrew Jackson and Ronald Reagan. Reckon the election of your sitting VP as a third term for the sitting president, and you can rank those two with FDR who personally won a third term.
So it's somewhat ironic that a sitting VP is generally a shoo-in for his party's presidental nomination - it's not that good a credential for winning election, necessarily.
Every administration puts out pious platitudes about how much its VP does - and everyone understands that that is nonsense; presidents don't even like the idea of VP any more than people like to write their own wills. But with Cheney, no one doubts that it is true.
Our republican tradition is that a person's ability and energy, and not his family, determines what office he will or will not attain. If we were true to that code, we Republicans would nominate a person who
- is a popular, twice-elected governor
- would be a suitable choice for the Supreme Court.
The only trouble is that the person who best fits that picture frame is not only the son of one president but the brother of another.
18
posted on
02/26/2005 7:23:29 AM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
To: Always Right
Their timing is off. Half way though term two is more likely.
19
posted on
02/26/2005 7:23:51 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Incumbent VP Rice in 2008.)
To: Huck
Cheney/Rice in 2008 sure has a sweet sound to it, but alas I doubt if it is to be.
20
posted on
02/26/2005 7:25:00 AM PST
by
blastdad51
(Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson