We have a duty to protect someone from being killed against their will. This not a "right to die" case where someone's hooked up to a machine and wrote a living will specifying no heroic measures be taken to extend their lives or they want to be made comfortable as much as possible in their final days. This is about allowing someone to kill another human being with the full blessing of the state. I submit its absolutely unacceptable in America and must not be allowed to set a precedent.
(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")
>>We have a duty to protect someone from being killed against their will.
So true! This case is SOOOOO wrong in soooo many ways!
Just take a jury of 12 women to Terri's room when she feeling good, and let them watch while she gets a nice warm BATH! Her extreme pleasure from that will convince all of them that she is RESPONSIVE and communicative, and still enjoying life in her own ways.
Two weeks ago, her father kissed her, and she RETURNED his kiss! Terri is NOT in PVS!
The abuse and neglect allegations ALSO need investigation as well, so 3 cheers for the DCF! The current guardianship is also obviously wrong with such strong conflicts of interest.
|
|
|
