Posted on 02/23/2005 3:23:06 PM PST by srm913
The biggest criticism is about water. Where is the water to support this level of urbanization in the Southwest?
Excuse me, but basing your opinion of Britain on what the Guardian publishes is about the same as we basing our opinion on you based on the Washington Post or New York Times.
Ivan
More dwellings, less cities sounds fine to me.
Where's the barf alert on this post?
Jealous, whiny little leftist. I wonder where he would live if he had a choice?
Problem: People are building on developed land
Response: People have to live somewhere
Counterresponse: Radical population control; state-ordered abortion
No excuse needed, Sir. Point well taken.
Heaven forbid others should take their opinion of us based on the National Enquirer.
I used to live in the southwest (Arizona, So. Cal, and New Mexico), and the irrigation factor is huge. To have a yard, you must have an in-ground automatic sprinkler system that you're willing to pay to use daily or else go out and move around the old hose and sprinkler all the time. The other option is to have a dirt/rock/cactus landscaping design. But of course, during droughts (which So. Cal. certainly isn't having right now but has had quite a bit in the past) even washing your car may be forbidden. With these areas growing, that problem could worsen.
the jealousy oozes....or is it "ooses"? the bluebloods dont like their "z's"...
eff europe.
I live/sometimes live in Silicon Valley. I love the houses from the 70's. They have so much character and are really great and inventive structures. The modern Mcmansions are grotesque though. They are either grey or pastel pink or blue. They also seem to have no garden and are all carbon copies of each other. My old house was knocked down to make room for one of these things. Unfortuantley I did not have the million or so dollars to buy it.
"ancient" citrus groves?
WTF is this drone talking about? That's just laughable.
The problem with the sprawl is real, but not for the reasons he paints.
First:
For those of you who haven't read a map lately, Phoenix is in the middle of a DESERT.
Translated: otherwise useless land, except for brush fires.
Second:
The problem is that everyone buys an SUV and has to commute an hour or more on crowded roads while talking on their CELL PHONES.
Third:
It is both too far to bike or bus to work (all the time)
and too HOT (how does 110 in the SHADE sound?) for half the year.
Full Disclosure: Yeah, I miss Minnesota. You wanna make something of it? :-)
Most of those housing developments are nowhere land. Ugly identical houses right on top of each other laid out with wierd streets at dumb angles to make you turn a lot of corners to get anywhere so it feels like you're "getting away from it all".
I enjoy reading your posts, MadIvan.
Old Money never accepts New Money. Old story.
We don't need the cotton...we do need the housing.
First comment is that nothing lasts forever, I would think that Europe with it's overgrown and buried old villas would understand this. How many foundations of old houses lie buried beneath the dust of ages there? The second is that building and moving around is in our national character.
References like this and his horror over burgeoning Republican enclaves in exurbia suggest the author is a socialist who disdains social dynamism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.