Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darnright; Northern Yankee; Victoria Delsoul
However, there was a huge award given Michael Shiavo for the express purpose of caring for his wife.

I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?

131 posted on 02/22/2005 1:52:55 PM PST by kstewskis (Tolerance is something that happens when one loses their principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?

Exactly Right! There should be some sort of accountability.

161 posted on 02/22/2005 3:38:08 PM PST by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: kstewskis; Northern Yankee
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?

That would be nice, but as long as he enjoys judicial protection, he's almost untouchable.

181 posted on 02/22/2005 6:02:16 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: kstewskis
My thoughts exactly. Why should the estranged husband, Michael Schiavo get the money he refused to use to rehabilitate Terri? The money should go back to whoever made it available.

Has anyone a photo of the mistress Jodi? Seems she has been kept under wraps. So Terri's supporters won't recognize her if she joins them?

185 posted on 02/22/2005 6:21:44 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: kstewskis; Darnright; Northern Yankee; Victoria Delsoul; Dante3
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?

I believe that the Schindlers have looked into this angle, and the company is now defunct.They were bought out or liquidated years ago. I'm sure they'd love their money back, though.

191 posted on 02/22/2005 6:41:53 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: kstewskis

We can only hope! Who would be the one to pursue this?


303 posted on 02/22/2005 10:04:55 PM PST by ArmyTeach (Pray daily for our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: kstewskis
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?

The company that paid off is gone. No longer exists. El goneoreno.

562 posted on 02/27/2005 10:24:28 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson