To: Darnright; Northern Yankee; Victoria Delsoul
However, there was a huge award given Michael Shiavo for the express purpose of caring for his wife. I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?
131 posted on
02/22/2005 1:52:55 PM PST by
kstewskis
(Tolerance is something that happens when one loses their principles.)
To: kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?Exactly Right! There should be some sort of accountability.
To: kstewskis; Northern Yankee
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to? That would be nice, but as long as he enjoys judicial protection, he's almost untouchable.
To: kstewskis
My thoughts exactly. Why should the estranged husband, Michael Schiavo get the money he refused to use to rehabilitate Terri? The money should go back to whoever made it available.
Has anyone a photo of the mistress Jodi? Seems she has been kept under wraps. So Terri's supporters won't recognize her if she joins them?
185 posted on
02/22/2005 6:21:44 PM PST by
Dante3
To: kstewskis; Darnright; Northern Yankee; Victoria Delsoul; Dante3
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?I believe that the Schindlers have looked into this angle, and the company is now defunct.They were bought out or liquidated years ago. I'm sure they'd love their money back, though.
191 posted on
02/22/2005 6:41:53 PM PST by
Ohioan from Florida
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
To: kstewskis
We can only hope! Who would be the one to pursue this?
303 posted on
02/22/2005 10:04:55 PM PST by
ArmyTeach
(Pray daily for our troops.)
To: kstewskis
I'm wondering if the company who paid MS off on the contingency of caring for his wife can counter sue for the money, since he's done nothing of the sort as to what he testified to?The company that paid off is gone. No longer exists. El goneoreno.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson