Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


A New Species in the Making?

Also reported in Current Biology

Also like pet dogs, the domesticated foxes can "read" human cues (pointing, for example) much better than their wild cousins or even tame chimpanzees, according to a new study published today in Current Biology. The study authors call such behavior social intelligence. They say its appearance in domesticated foxes may help us better understand how intelligence developed in humans and other animals.

And in Nature:

Friendly foxes are cleverer For almost half a century, a population of foxes in Siberia has been bred to be unafraid of humans and non-aggressive. Now these foxes seem to have shown that social skills come as a perk of being friendly. Dogs, domesticated from their wild wolf cousins over millennia, are not only less likely to bite or bolt, but have also gained the ability to communicate with their human companions. For example, if a human points or looks at an object, the dog will also look at it.

Brian Hare, an anthropologist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, had previously shown that dogs are more likely than undomesticated animals - even chimps - to be able to communicate in this way with humans. But was this social sophistication something that was specifically bred for during their domestication, or was it a by-product? We were really surprised - we all thought that the foxes were going to fail.

An opportunity to find out came from the Siberian foxes, which have been bred for friendliness but have had limited contact with humans. The project was set up in 1959 by Dmitry K. Belyaev of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics in Novosibirsk to examine the genetics of domestication.

Each fox is tested at the age of seven months to see whether they approach humans (and whether they bite). The 'friendlier' foxes are bred, and a separate, control, population is bred randomly. Hare and his team studied fox kits that had spent "probably a grand total of 20 minutes" with humans, according to Hare, so they could not have learned how to interact with them.

Introduced into a room with two hiding places for food and a human pointing and gazing intently at the one spot that actually concealed food, the 'tame' foxes took the hint and found it, whereas the 'wild' ones were flummoxed. The researchers report their results in Current Biology.

"We were really surprised - we all thought that the foxes were going to fail," admits Hare. It seems, therefore, that social intelligence does not have to be specifically selected for. It simply comes along with friendliness. Hare believes that his results have implications for the oft-debated origins of human social intelligence. Perhaps humans found it favorable to be less aggressive and fearful, and to be more tolerant and cooperative, and these changes brought along with them a boost in cognitive skills.

"Selection for being smart might not have been the first step," suggests Hare. "First you need to have a change in how you view your social world, so we had a platform from which these new abilities can evolve." Other researchers caution that the results of the test can not be taken too far. Bruce Blumberg, who studies animal cognition at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, and Ray Coppinger, a canine biologist at Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts, say that one cannot quite say that this test definitively shows an ability in foxes. Perhaps the 'tame' foxes were just more interested in food, they suggest.

"Hare and colleagues' latest results are intriguing," says Blumberg. "But much much more work needs to be done before we can make any definitive claims, or generalize beyond the results that they have generated." The specially domesticated foxes are not only socially adept, adds Hare, they are regular charmers. "They behave like dogs," he says. "They whine and bark, they wag their tails, they pee for joy, and they just want to cuddle with you." But don't expect fox kits to be appearing in pet stores any time soon. The foxes have a pungent musk and love to dig and hide food, says Hare. "They would bury your food in your sofa and you would only find it three months later."


1 posted on 02/22/2005 8:43:07 AM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: PatrickHenry

News ping!


2 posted on 02/22/2005 8:43:43 AM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

awwww


3 posted on 02/22/2005 8:44:29 AM PST by sassbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

To make them no fun for hunters no doubt. What did they DO with the 45,000?


4 posted on 02/22/2005 8:44:57 AM PST by jwalburg (Those buried included children still clutching toys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

I married a cute, tame, fox ... oh nevermind.


7 posted on 02/22/2005 8:46:41 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

Did he say cute foxes?

10 posted on 02/22/2005 8:49:38 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
When breeding the animals, they only chose them on how well they responded to people.

That's how I chose a person to breed with myself.

Or is that too much information?

13 posted on 02/22/2005 8:50:25 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Dear Howard Dean: Please Protect Me From Your Righteous Followers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Foxfire4

Cute fuzzy ping.

}:-)4


14 posted on 02/22/2005 8:50:38 AM PST by Moose4 (http://www.livejournal.com/~moose4. Because the Internet was made for self-important wanking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

They should breed tame racoons as pets.


17 posted on 02/22/2005 8:52:04 AM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

Breed or Manufacture?


24 posted on 02/22/2005 9:05:37 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

so how long before they hit the pet shops?


25 posted on 02/22/2005 9:10:37 AM PST by CONSERVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

We already have one. She is a Papillion.

27 posted on 02/22/2005 9:17:23 AM PST by ORECON (Condi Rice/Donald Rumsfield - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
Do we want a critter that isn't quite as doggy as a dog, not to mention one that will P4 Joy? And that one on the right in the pic looks a little buzzed, don't you think?

One good thing comes out of this. Scientists have finally concluded that if you're going to be tolerant and cooperative it helps not to be a fool. Duuuuuuh....

Now, what about those 45000 pelts? They are where?

31 posted on 02/22/2005 9:24:01 AM PST by Graymatter (There are times when the Rule of Law needs an override.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

Fantastic. I had a pet fox when I was a child and it was wonderful--smart, sweet, funny, constantly playful. I'd love to have another one. I might have to have a little talk with my Basenji first, though.


32 posted on 02/22/2005 9:24:07 AM PST by Capriole (the Luddite hypocritically clicking away on her computer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

bttt


34 posted on 02/22/2005 9:24:44 AM PST by dennisw (Seeing as how this is a .44 magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world .........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
they pee for joy,

*****************

Uh, I think I'll stick with hounds, thanks.

35 posted on 02/22/2005 9:28:42 AM PST by trisham (proudly jackbooted and pajama clad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
Take a look at this site http://www.kc.net/~wolf2dog/wayne2.htm about the molecular evolution of the dog family.

The number of chromosomes varies from 36 in the Red fox to 78 in wolf and jackal. The domestic dog is an extremely close relative of the gray wolf, differing from it by at most 0.2% of mtDNA sequence.
36 posted on 02/22/2005 9:29:16 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
...Perhaps humans found it favorable to be less aggressive and fearful, and to be more tolerant and cooperative, and these changes brought along with them a boost in cognitive skills.


38 posted on 02/22/2005 9:37:11 AM PST by pageonetoo (you'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

They will become fashionable and every half-wit moron will want one. More animals to be abused.


44 posted on 02/22/2005 9:52:14 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666

BTTT


46 posted on 02/22/2005 9:57:59 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: balrog666
I've long wanted to see somebody domesticate the grizzly bear. If they could somehow be given the social instincts of dogs, what fantastic guard (or labor) animals they would make!

Polar bears would also be interesting candidates for domestication.

47 posted on 02/22/2005 10:00:10 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson