They can spray another layer of Pledge on that turd, but...
LOL! The Slimes wishes it so....
NY TIMES!!
Seeing as how this is from the NYT - I'd give it a credibility rating of ZERO!
Well, this just proves how stupid the Sheeple are.
"Hmmm. She's changing what she's saying. Maybe she'll use her evil powers for Good now. Hand me that ballot again, dear."
Sigh.
This story has Hillary's hoofprints all over it.
Be careful, very careful of what you read in the NYT. It is not known for its accuracy.
If they like the Hilderbest ... the're not Republicans
Conventional wisdom??? How about...uh...reality??? Common sense even???
God help us!
WHAT a bunch of HORSECRAP!!
"A measure of how far Senator Clinton has come was on display Sunday when Senator John McCain, Republican from Arizona, said on "Meet the Press" that he thought Mrs. Clinton, a Democrat, would make a good president, although he said that he would support his party's nominee. She returned the compliment..."
@ss licks butt and, in turn, butt kisses @ss. Why would the clymers at the NYT think it would be any different?
Think back to John (the French Looking One) Kerry back in March,2004. He had a free ride from the liberal media(a redundantcy), he had a low negative number, high positives, and then the Bush team went to work to define him, and the whole picture changed.
Analyzing and polling H. R.Clinton's chances for 2008 right now is so premature and futile, it makes as much sense as analyzing the election in Iran, which will probably take place before then.
Vince Foster's mistress could have a 0 negative rating and it wouldn't matter, until her opponents begin to define her
as the power-hungry political beast she really is.
I'll tell ya'll what made me sick tonight---
I made the mistake of watching Joe Scarborough---at the very end of his show, he showed exerpts of Hillary's interview on MTP yesterday morning---after that, they had a picture of her in the upper right corner of the screen with the words "Hillary Watch" above her head and a "clock" with 1,300 and something days until 2008 on it, and Joe said that everyday they would let US know what Hillary is doing in her quest for the White HOuse---
Now, I thought the MSM went WAY overboard in propping up Kerry, but this is ridiculous---every single night they are gonna give Hillary FREE tv time to her campaign---she hasn't even officially declared herself a candidate for Senator yet, let alone President!!!
Of course the rest of Joe's show before the big unveiling of the Hillary Watch cam was about the Bush tapes and whether Bush set this up with Doug Wead---blech------
Let the NY Times dress this pig up for the slaughter.
New York Republicans that voted for Bloomberg? LOL
Oh, I know there are SOME real Republicans in N.Y. but most would be considered Liberals in any other state.
Nice try N.Y.T.'s but McCain and N.Y. Republicans are not a good litmus test and you know it.
Just get used to it. Hillary has learned to be an effective and supple politician. She's come a long way baby.
This goes to show that Long Island and Up-state NY are full of RINOs, who think its 'cool' to have a celebrity as their Senator.
This is just a taste of things to come from the media. Just wait; the terms "moderate" and "centrist" will be applied by the mainstream media to Hillary more times in the next 4 yrs than it has been to all other people who ever lived, combined!
By the time they are through, Webster will have added "Hillary Clinton" as one of its definitions for a moderate or centrist.
A measure of how far Senator Clinton has come was on display Sunday when Senator John McCain, Republican from Arizona, said on "Meet the Press" that he thought Mrs. Clinton, a Democrat, would make a good president
John McCain, now that's a real testimony to the heartbeat of the Republican party. He doesn't even rate RINO status.
I can see it now, Clinton/McCain 08.