Posted on 02/19/2005 8:16:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, who has resigned effective March 1, will not appear Tuesday before a legislative committee investigating his handling of millions in federal voting funds.
The Joint Legislative Audit Committee opted not to seek Shelley's testimony, but retains the right to request his presence at a future hearing, said Assemblywoman Nicole Parra, a Hanford Democrat who chairs the committee.
"We want to build a foundation before we even discuss calling Shelley forward," Parra said.
Tuesday's hearing will focus largely on what Shelley's office is doing to correct problems cited in a state audit, which portrayed his agency as highly partisan, disorganized, indifferent to state and federal rules, and willing to use what was intended to be nonpartisan election money to push Democratic causes.
Republican members of the committee did not object Friday to a slate of four witnesses, but they expressed frustration at what they consider the panel's slow pace.
"We need to kick it into gear a bit if it's going to be a successful process," said Assemblyman Charles Poochigian, a Fresno Republican who serves as the committee's vice chairman.
--snip--
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/02/19/BAGKDBE2PV1.DTL
His quitting makes testimony less likely, Democrats say Christian Berthelsen, Chronicle Staff Writer
Saturday, February 19, 2005
Sacramento -- The chairwoman of the legislative committee investigating Secretary of State Kevin Shelley's handling of federal voting act funds Friday formally dropped her demand that Shelley testify next week, a marked change from last month when she threatened to subpoena him before he resigned.
Before he agreed to leave office, Democrats sought an agreement from Republican counterparts that Shelley would not have to testify if he agreed to leave office. Shelley's desire to avoid testifying before the committee was said by his associates to be a driving factor in his decision to resign.
Republicans never agreed to the overture, but Democrats suggested privately Friday that Shelley's departure from office made it less likely he would ever appear as a witness.
Shelley resigned Feb. 4 under an avalanche of criticism over everything from his treatment of employees and management of the federal Help America Vote Act to questionable contributions to his 2002 secretary of state campaign.
The California state auditor said Shelley's office may have misspent as much as $1.9 million in HAVA funds -- which were intended to modernize the voting infrastructure but were used to hire Democratic partisan consultants and associates of Shelley. The Joint Legislative Audit Committee began holding hearings into the matter in January.
The chairwoman of the committee holding the hearing, Assemblywoman Nicole Parra, D-Hanford, said she had made "no final decision" about whether Shelley would need to appear and said she had not ruled out calling Shelley as a witness eventually.
But there are other rifts developing between Republican and Democratic members on the committee, particular over the future scope and focus of the hearings.
Democrats have focused on making sure the federal funds are safeguarded. As Parra said Friday, her focus will be on "where are we now and what do we need to do" to ensure that California receives continued funding for voting system modernization.
Republicans, on the other hand, want to focus on how the funds were handled and who was responsible.
--snip--
Translation,, We DEmocRATs, caught with ourhands in the till, need to delay, deny and divert as much atention form the open abuse of federal voting funds in a partisna manner.
Democrats have focused on making sure the federal funds are safeguarded. As Parra said Friday, her focus will be on "where are we now and what do we need to do" to ensure that California receives continued funding for voting system modernization.
What a whopper. The democRATS want to make sure federal funds are safeguarded..
Oh, tell me more, Nicole... I got a few spare sutures to stitch my sides back together, Let her rip..
This case should be an object lesson to all of those "I'm SOOOOO much more conservative than you are because I would vote for a rat over a rino" people.
Without Arnold rino in the gov's seat would this scandal have progressed to where this mutt had to leave?
If a rino does 1 good thing a week, that's 1 more than you'll get from the average rat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.