Posted on 02/18/2005 7:04:42 AM PST by ZGuy
Perhaps I shouldn't have been surprised at my reception last week at a Lakewood, Ohio hearing on banning smoking in restaurants and bars. Such events tend to bring out the penny-ante dictators. After all, when customers can readily find smoke-free facilities and nobody's forced to take a job, such bans are inherently authoritarian. But these people made Mussolini look like freedom's friend.
The nine-member commission appointed to advise the city council on the ban originally arranged to have six witnesses testify. Three for and three against, right? Try six for and zero against. Then they relented and deigned to allow one witness on the other side – until they discovered it was me.
Specifically, those behind the national jihad against so-called "passive smoking" insisted I must not speak. One email labeled me a "shock jock" – an interesting metaphor considering I've never even guest-hosted a radio show. (Note to broadcast producers: Not that I have anything against it. Ahem!)
Hours before my flight I got the word that the panel had, under the threat of civil disobedience from the Small Business Coalition of Cleveland, again relented. That is, so long as I went last after the media and bored audience members would be gone. My time was also cut by a third at the last minute, but I rather saw that coming.
So did I shock them? I hope so. Somehow the multitude of studies I discussed had been "overlooked" by the throng of witnesses before me.
I informed the panel that the study that began the crusade, published in 1993 by the Environmental Protection Agency had actually found no statistically significant link to lung cancer, requiring them to use a new standard for significance to get the "proper" results.
At that, the EPA also found a mere 17 percent increased risk. Yet the National Cancer Institute has said that even a 100 percent increase is "considered small" and is "usually difficult to interpret.
I noted that the other "authoritative" study linking passive smoke to lung cancer, commissioned by the World Health Organization, actually showed a statistically significant reduced risk for children of smokers and no increase for spouses and co-workers of smokers.
And I told them that the largest of the passive smoking studies (35,000 participants) and longest (39 years) found no "causal relationship between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (passive smoking) and tobacco-related mortality."
I was going to say that smoke-ban crusaders had attempted to link virtually every disease known to passive smoking "with the possible exception of herpes, hangnails, and hemorrhoids." But lo! One of the previous witnesses was a pediatrician who claimed passive smoke did cause herpes.
This just in! The herpes VIRUS is actually caused by tobacco smoke!
Fancy that, a virus spread by smoke. It's impossible to satirize these zealots, nor to exaggerate their arrogance.
"Passive smoking" is not a scientific term but a propaganda one. A 1975 New England Journal of Medicine study found that even back then, when having smoke obnoxiously puffed into your face was ubiquitous in restaurants and bars, the concentration was equal to merely 4/1000s of a cigarette per hour.
And while obviously you can inhale smoke from others' cigarettes, we also know "the dose makes the poison." Thus we are constantly bombarded by such human carcinogens as ultraviolet radiation and estrogens but in such small amounts the body's defense systems ward them off. We weren't built to defend against several cigarette packs daily.
None of which matters to the activists, to whom any means justifies the end. Having made all the progress they can with "Your smoking will kill you," they changed tack to "Your smoking will kill others." (Or at least give them herpes.)
Former Surgeon General David Satcher essentially admitted as much at a Washington, D.C. hearing when he said a ban on workplace smoking would "be effective in creating a new social norm that discourages people from smoking."
Smoking – real smoking – is both vile and deadly. I fully sympathize with those who want to see it go the way of the mastodon. But they lose me when they slip on the jackboots and fudge the science.
So now you know why there was so much fuss and feathers over my impending testimony. It wasn't the Fumento they were afraid of; it was the facts.
I wonder if the Surgeon general said the same about black people out of the work place or women out of the work place.
People that choose to smoke today are modern day slaves and treated like slaves by the government and society but fear not, the government and society makes vast sums of money by taxing a minority today.
about time someone layed it out plain and clear
Another one ping
Try six for and zero against.
When only 25-30% of the people smoke, we lose out in the votes and polls everytime until the general public wakes up and learns the truth behind the war on the smokers.
It wasn't the Fumento they were afraid of; it was the facts.
That is one reason the anti's do not want to hear from our side. They spew lies and talk out of both sides of their mouths to instigate smoking bans. When our side stands up with the true facts, they don't want to hear it. It's their way or the highway.
The anti's want to control, ban and restrict smokers while the lawmakers can't get enough of our tax dollars.
So, what is it going to be? Ban cigarettes and let the states forget about all those tax dollars or open business's back up to make their own decisions about accommodating both smokers and non-smokers?
As long as the bad science and lies persist - I will continue to try to educate people about the nondangers of ETS.
To bad he failed to address the most fundamental issue, private property rights!
That's it! With every lie the anti's put into the media, we have to stand up and throw it back at them. I'm sick and tired of this 'coalition' sticking it to 25-30% of people who choose to enjoy a legal commodity.
I don't see a war on abortion like we see on the smokers. The gays are getting their rights and people who smoke are constantly being trashed, bashed, controlled, banned and restricted.
Yet, the lawmakers are screaming that they can't balance their damn budgets without the tax dollars smokers pay on cigarettes. Smoker's have become the Rope! Anti's pulling on us from the left and the lawmakers pulling on us from the right.
Are we sick of it yet?
Ah! City Councils. Another group of idiots where the power has gone to their heads.
They are voted in to tend to the cities business. NOT run the business of the cities.
I believe the latest number is 22%; that's a drop of almost 26% over 40 years, one would think the mortality rates would start showing a correlation soon for something so putatively dangerous.
Bump
And so on and so on and scooby do be dooby.
We don't need no stinkin' facts!
Just go with the flow and understand that individualism just makes life difficult.
After all, if one focus's on personal contentment it just shows a disdain for the writings of Marx.
The fight against AIDS is relentless through massive funding, however the fight for the rights of the carrier of AIDS is just as relentless.
The providers (tax payers) of the funds, via government, many who are smokers, are paying for the privilege of some to lead a dangerous lifestyle and at the same time are paying double for their own lifestyle via government dictation for the lifestyle of the carrier of AIDS who are promoted as a recipient of funds for their demise.
Go figure...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.