Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study finds Windows more secure than Linux
The Seattle Time ^ | 2/17/05 | Brier Dudley

Posted on 02/17/2005 9:47:00 AM PST by rit

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-458 last
To: antiRepublicrat

" Given Microsoft's campaign against Linux, it's obvious that Microsoft thinks Linux is a threat to Windows."

I think it's called hedging your bets. Nothing lasts forever, but MS has a pretty good track record so far. In any case, Linux is a direct replacement for UNIX in many applications.


441 posted on 02/22/2005 9:00:51 AM PST by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: usgator
I have about 100 MB for my /boot partition, and about 1GB for my swap partition. I never get anyclose to using it all though, as I have 1GB of RAM.

/home is placed on its own separate partition (and disk), and / is placed on the remaining space. For instance, I have two drives, /dev/hde, and /dev/hdg (don't ask why), /dev/hdg is reserved for /home, while /dev/hde1 is /boot, /dev/hde2 is swap, and /dev/hde3 is /.

442 posted on 02/22/2005 11:13:35 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Thanks.  I'll give this a try tonight!
443 posted on 02/22/2005 1:00:26 PM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Depends on the case. I remember Microsoft going to Largo, Florida to get that successful migration and anti-FUD nightmare reversed. Largo's IT chief said the Microsoft reps left after admitting they couldn't match the low Linux TCO (although they could have given better TC0).

WTF else would you expect the Largo IT chief to say? If he admitted otherwise, he wouldn't have a job.
444 posted on 02/24/2005 7:52:04 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
WTF else would you expect the Largo IT chief to say? If he admitted otherwise, he wouldn't have a job.

So now you're accusing him of lying? Admit it, TCO is on a case-by-case basis, and this was a clear case where Microsoft couldn't match the Linux TCO.

445 posted on 02/24/2005 7:57:57 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: usgator
US:

Much depends on what youre going to use it for:

Swap: 512M, at most... if the box has a good amount of memory you can scale that back to 256M

Boot: 125M, you can go lower but when you update a Linux kernel many distros leave the old one there as a fall back if the update breaks something.

Usr: if this box is just for home use I would not bother with a usr partition, just put the rest in '/'..

446 posted on 02/25/2005 7:39:36 AM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
Thanks.  So, I should do the partitions on (hdb2) in this order?
/boot (125m) /swap (512m) /usr (remainder or partition 30 gigs)
/hdb5           /hdb6 /hdb7
The other partition is a Fat32 partition with remainder of the 120 gig drive.

When I copy the boot.lnx using dd if=/dev/hdb2 of=/mnt/boot.lnx bs=512 count=1, the boot.lnx file contains a bunch of gibberish with something to the effect of "disk not bootable" embedded inside.

Any ideas?  This is driving me crazy.  I've been trying to get Linux to boot for like 2 weeks or more.

447 posted on 02/25/2005 9:42:38 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: usgator

Well US note that hdb2 is itself a partition, (the second partition on your second IDE harddrive). What you want to do is create three partitions

hdb2: 125M
hdb3: 512M (type Linux swap)
hdb4: Whatever is left..

you have a mandrake CD and you cant boot and set up off of that?


448 posted on 02/25/2005 9:49:58 AM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
I know about partitions, sorry, should have worded that better.

you have a mandrake CD and you cant boot and set up off of that

"That's the fact, jack" =)   I go thru the whole setup, no errors.  I have in my windows boot.ini file the correct info for a dual boot.  The problem is when I try to copy the boot.lnx file.  Inside this file is the junk with the "disk not bootable" written inside of it.  When I try to boot into Linux using the boot.ini it goes into the black screen with some "Y"s and indecypherable characters.

This is very frustrating, and I don't want to give up, but I'm wasting way too much time loading, reformatting, reloading, etc.  Any help you can give would go a long way toward helping to (maybe) convert an MS person to Linux.

449 posted on 02/25/2005 10:11:34 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: usgator

I have not done a floppy install in years but Ill dig around and see what I can find. I might reccommend fedora..


450 posted on 02/25/2005 10:21:26 AM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
My computer is about a year old and does not have a floppy drive.  That's why I am trying to copy the boot/lnx onto the hdb2 /mnt drive .
451 posted on 02/25/2005 10:24:59 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: usgator
When it comes to dual boot systems, I have a strict method of doing things that works 100% of the time:

  1. Install Windows.
  2. Turn off computer, move Windows HDD to slave or secondary master position.
  3. Install Linux on new master drive, putting bootloader (Grub or Lilo) into the MBR of the new master drive.
  4. Edit Linux bootloader to point to Windows as an option. It is possible to make Windows the default OS in this way.
This process allows you to (a) install Windows in the manner it likes, and (b), install Linux exactly like a stand-alone distro, thus ensuring that everything works correctly.

If you already have an existing Windows installation, you can obviously skip step 1 above. Just move the drive to a secondary position and move your new, empty HDD to the master position.

452 posted on 02/25/2005 10:33:42 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: usgator

Why cant you boot off the CD?


453 posted on 02/25/2005 10:44:47 AM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I'm a software person and know next to nothing about hardware or system admin.

I have stuff in Windows that I don't want to lose.   It is backed up, of course, but it would take a LOT of work to put it back, plus licensed downloads, etc.  If something goes wrong ... well, it won't be a good thing.

Actually, I do have another PC I can try this method on, and probably will, but it doesn't help me with this one.

If something does go wrong, and, of course it will, how can I recover the original MBR, etc.  I am worried if this is too great a risk just to get Linux installed.  I want to install this, but cannot risk destroying MS at this point.  My job depends upon having MS working.

I DID have this dual-boot (Win XP/Mandrake) running once before on this PC, so I know it IS capable.  I lost the Mandrake kernal (completely my fault) and had to reinstall.  The first time I installed it I had some guy screw it up and I lost Windows and CANNOT take that chance again.

454 posted on 02/25/2005 10:59:35 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: usgator
...how can I recover the original MBR,...

I think you are misunderstanding me. The linux bootloader goes on the MBR of the new master--not your Windows drive. You will not touch your windows drive at all during the installation of Linux onto the new master drive.

455 posted on 02/25/2005 11:03:34 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
What do you mean by "boot off the CD"?

I can boot, use rescue and get into the HDB2.

Is this what you mean?

I just want to get to the KDE interface or Login or whatever, I don;t care if I have to put a key in, push the clutch or whatever as long as I get there! =)

456 posted on 02/25/2005 11:07:50 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Interesting, still a bit worried.  As I put in the other post, I had some guy who claimed to be a "Linux Guru" do something like this and he KILLED my PC.
457 posted on 02/25/2005 11:10:38 AM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: usgator
Interesting, still a bit worried.

I totally understand. If you are not comfortable taking apart a computer, I wouldn't do it. However, other than my suggestion, I am unable to help. I will continue to watch this thread to see if I can learn something, thougk.

Good luck.

458 posted on 02/25/2005 11:22:14 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-458 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson