Posted on 02/14/2005 7:18:56 PM PST by cyn
I think he resigned because there was MORE than just this one comment. I bet this one ity bitty comment was just the tip of the iceberg. I bet the new reality is that all MSM types percieve a bullseye on all their past comments.
I bet the suits asked him what else was out there first, THEN he was asked to fall on his sword.
MSM should take note for their carreers. If it is not on FR, its not news and you are not an important "journalist".
Looks like, when we're just slummin' it, FR does half again as much as DU did at its peak. :') And that peak is only 250 per million Americans, or 75,000. FR's peak appears to be 285,000, and currently 180,000. Wowzo.
the only way CNN can benefit from FR is to have a troll post a thread which tells us CNN is going to mention FR.
However if the Aaaron brown story is an indication, it will just be FR bashing stories which do not report the truth. (ie the rumor story which CNN conveniently does not mention that FR poo pooed the story as a mere rumor.)
CNN would be better off just hiring a pretty body to just DRYLY read FR comments without selection.
OH Man I miss Aaron I rather watch Animal Cops on Animal Planet at that time
What a hit piece from CNN & Kutz
I'm betting the "suits" saw a copy of the tape
Segment was done by Howard Kurtz, CNN Washington. Entire segment lasted about 3 minutes. This is the middle portion:
...He [Jordan] backed off that statement when challenged, to what degree is not clear, and later said he never meant to suggest, and doesnt believe, that soldiers were intentionally killing people they knew to be journalists.Wow. Who wrote this script? It is awesome. And the intonation -- well, the italics are an attempt to recreate that.But bloggers, led by such conservatives as radio host Hugh Hewitt and National Review Online, began pounding Jordan.
But the mainstream press, with the exception of a few newspaper articles and talk shows, ignored the story, and yet it didnt matter.
The businessman who posted the first account of what he heard Jordan say at Davos had started a brushfire.
[Jeff Jarvis, Buzzmachine.com, speaking:]
Anyone who is a witness to news can be a reporter because anyone and everyone has access to the press through the internet. Every one is a Wolf Blitzer in sheeps clothing.
Jordan was already controversial for writing in the New York Times two years ago that CNN had not reported some of Saddam Husseins abuses to protect its Iraqi employees.
Why does CNN or CBS, which came under cyberspace fire for Dan Rathers discredited story on President Bush, care what bloggers say?
These online commentators can generate enough noise that they push a story into the press [sorry, but Ive gotta interject here: Hellooooo, OM, what weve been asking is why isnt the story already there?] or circumvent the main stream media entirely by communicating directly with computer users.
The people who own the printing presses and television towers are no longer the gatekeepers of what is news.
This proves it. CNN will do almost anything to get ten more viewers. That's all they'll get at the most from the thousands who come here. We don't care what they have to say.
It would be cool if we all just boycotted DU for a week just to freak them out with how much their numbers drop.
Problem is they'd get an idea pretty quick of who the plants were.
lol, and right after that, he was heard to say, "JimRob da mon!"
I especially like this one:
"But the mainstream press, with the exception of a few newspaper articles and talk shows, ignored the story, and yet it didnt matter."
How did that get by? Or are they so naive there, think no one cares what they are doing? Helloooo??
DU has a thread where they're attempting to figure out why FR is higher than DU on alexa. I mean, a reason besides the most obvious one ;)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3097953
I think I just made my last trip to DU. I'm always open to the opposite point of view, but it's too damned repetitive over there.
I thought the number stood for daily "hits" or visits, until I tried an Alexa search on my main website, The Xenophile Historian. According to my counter I'm getting about 800 hits a day, but the number Alexa gave me is almost 4,000. Hmmmm . . .
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/?url=xenohistorian.faithweb.com
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.