Posted on 02/14/2005 7:05:40 PM PST by Jenya
Looks good.
Thanx. It sure beats Greta and the never ending saga of the plastic pedophile (Michael Jackson)
I like the term 'Rabid Attack Bloggers' from another thread.
I'm listening to my new C.D. valentine's present! Franz Ferdinand...sounds like old school 80's new wave with a modern twist! Very retro! So...getting to the point...tell us about it!
Good stuff! He began with a big ole rant, pretty fired up. (Ranted at the liberal professor phenonemon again)
Now extolling the virtues of blogs for taking people down! Niiice. He seems to be in a I'm-out-for-bear mood. :D
He's so peppy and sparkling and enthused tonite LOL
I just saw a post pulled talking about freerepublic's user terms and saying they were a joke. They were talking about free speech and saying ideas were not allowed here that were not conservative. I've seen many non-conservative ideas stated here. Sure they may get attacked, but c'mon you are asking for it...this is a conservative site! Sure there are rules, but it would be chaos otherwise. Just like the terms of agreement state: This is not a chat room! So we like to refrain from obscenities, and name calling here! It's hard to understand why the dims think that is so bad! This whole "free speech" misinterpretation makes me sick. Censorship has been labled so negative, but it has its place.
Happy Valentines Day to you too Joe Scarborough.
For those that saw the end of his first segment will know what I mean.
You think he would promote a website if I emailed it to him.
www.stoptheaclu.org
????
Scarborough is not seperating the difference between forums and bloggs.
I hope Bob Beckel guests on Scarbourogh like he did tonight on H&C. Beckel showed his hiney worse than usual whining about the bloggers.
If this was a serious piece they would have had Robinson front and center.
(btw this is an effort to build up the leftist blogs.)
Watching! I was hoping this would be posted. :)
why is scarborough only having left wing blog talking heads?
This is absurd. Talk about the FORUMS JOE!!!!!
Well, I'd like to say that we're lilly white in that regard, but I've seen otherwise. In fact, I'm having to be very careful tailoring the language if this very message so as to possibly avoid getting "cyber-whacked".
It's kinda like talking on the phone these days and having that feeling that you'd better not say anything critical of the government. (Does anybody else have that feeling?)
This agitator fool is just bashing internet posters with comming out and saying it is CONSERVATIVES "blogs" he hates.
Scarborough's staff are equally lazy for not having balance.
Jeeeeeeze, hellloooooo the internet is the 24/7 town hall discussion of STORIES AND DATA AND INFORMATION!!!!
IT IS ABOUT STORIES GETTTING COVERATE THAT THE MSM IS CENSORING!!!!
The old guy was right in saying the Mediots are LAZY!
"It's kinda like talking on the phone these days and having that feeling that you'd better not say anything critical of the government. (Does anybody else have that feeling?)"
Paranoid much?
Hugh Hewitt isn't that old......
Good grief, it must be something in the Secacus water, even Joe sucks now.
I don't have that feeling here cause I don't care. I know what I believe, and sometimes it can be influenced by good friends here who share most of my ideas. But I don't know any of you, so I could care less if any of you disagree with a certain subject. For instance, I could state that find socialism an interesting subject, and you could all attack me. I wouldn't care. Despite that I hate socialism, despite what you say, I'd still think it was an interesting subject. Debate is fun to me however. I don't come in here trying to start trouble though. I come to spend time with like minded people, to reinforce my own ideas, and to find support.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.