Posted on 02/14/2005 6:14:12 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Anti-American Academy: Robert Jensen
Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin. He says the United States is a depraved criminal nation bent on dominating the world, and Ward Churchill is right.
Ward Churchill is right about 9/11.
I state that bluntly, even though I disagree with some aspects of the University of Colorado professors now-infamous essay, because so many (including some on the left) have defended his First Amendment rights while either remaining silent about, or condemning, the articles analysis.
So, for the record: The main thesis Churchill put forward in Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens is an accurate account of the depravity of U.S. foreign policy and its relationship to terrorism. Later Ill return to my disagreements, but at a moment when right-wing forces have targeted not only Churchill but academic freedom and the left in general, it is more important than ever to stand firm on that point.
Malcolm X was correct, and it was appropriate for Churchill to quote him: Chickens do, indeed, come home to roost. And whether U.S. citizens want to acknowledge it or not, there likely will be chickens heading our way for years to come.
I take Churchills central thesis to be that (1) U.S. crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes around the world from the genocidal campaigns against indigenous people on which this country was founded, through the post-World War II assaults (both by the U.S. military and through proxy forces) on the people of the Third World are crimes, in legal and moral terms; (2) while contemporary non-state terrorism is a complex phenomenon, U.S. policies aimed at domination and control around the world are one of several key factors in spawning such terrorism; and (3) we must study that history and those connections if we want to prevent further crimes, whether committed by the United States or against U.S. citizens.
I also take a core assertion of Churchills essay to be that we citizens of the U.S. empire bear some collective responsibility for those crimes, depending on our level of power and privilege, and our capacity for resistance. As Churchill explained recently, he includes himself in that category, not as a perpetrator but as a member of movements that have failed to stop the crimes (just as I would include myself). Further, those people at the top of the power pyramid must accept their responsibility for those crimes, even if they are not directly involved in the planning and execution of specific criminal acts. The technocrats at the very heart of Americas global financial empire which U.S. policy serves, he wrote, are not innocent. (More later on how to understand the boundaries of that category.)
In case you missed it, he is a journalism professor. This is how he feels about the country that has provided him with a privileged, comfortable lifestyle, and this is what hes teaching college-level journalism students.
He says Ward Churchill was showing his love when he called the murdered victims of 9/11 little Eichmanns.
For me, left politics resistance to unjust impositions of authority and the struggle for a sustainable world that balances a deep yearning for individual freedom and a deep sense of responsibility for each other is fueled by anger at the world as it exists, along with a love for people and an appreciation for the beauty of the non-human world. That righteous anger is powerful, as long as it does not slip into self-righteousness and stays in balance with that love. We can be glib about that struggle, but in reality the tension inside of each of us and inside our movements is not always easy to cope with. I wrestle with it every day.
Dorothy Day of the Catholic Worker Movement was fond of quoting a line from Dostoevskys The Brothers Karamazov: Love in action is a harsh and dreadful thing compared with love in dreams. In the essay he wrote on 9/11, I believe Churchill was facing those harsh and dreadful realities, and I believe that essay was his attempt on that day to take love out of the realm of dreams and make it real in the world, in action.
link only
last comment: RebTex 5:54:24 pm 2/14/05
email this article
All I had to do is be exposed to Jensen after 911 and never again..I am ashamed that he is a Texas professor.
Robert Jensen: Your trans-Atlantic flight is waiting.
Where do universities dig up these jackasses? Do these dip-sticks know where their paychecks come from?
Robert Jensen: Your ONE WAY trans-Atlantic flight is waiting.
Will I get in trouble for calling him a douche on this forum?
This "Hate America" thing I think is just a hobby.
"Do these dip-sticks know where their paychecks come from?"
Tenured professors don't care.
I don't know about anyone else but I've reached saturation point on Ward Churchill. Which usually means the libs are just getting started on him.
*****************************************************
|
Every major university is filled with Churchill-like vermin. When we are thru busting up the 5th column MSM, we must train our sites on the quislings in academia.
This guy is a frequent talk show guest. He probably made the statement to get another week of TV exposure.
That, and the fact that he is a US-hating slime weasel.
I hear the Enquirer pays well.
I guess this Jensen fellow and Chomsky agree that everyone that worked in the WTC was a Nazi who deserved to die. These people are sick, sick, sick!
Jensen poses the same ethical dilemna that Churchill does: What do you do with someone who ain't worth living and ain't worth killing?
Half-way should do.
"Journalism" is no longer a profession. It's more like an affliction.
Yeah, this guy's a real piece of work. As an Austinite, I'm embarassed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.