[ClintonBeGone]

I can't figure that out.

[marlon]

Oh well looks like I'm going to have to find a new search engine!

[smonk]

even more surprising when you consider that the GOP controlled both houses of congress and the white house.

[Paleo Conservative]

The really serious problem is that Google imposes it's political biases on its search engine.

[I_be_tc]

I switched to Clusty.

[volchef]

but but but I thought evil republicans controlled the tech sector and all of the software companies. Didn't they rig the electronic vote machines after all???? (sarcasm)

[yellowdoghunter]

I will do my best to avoid google from now on.

[FormerACLUmember]

WTF? What is the nature of the quid pro quo? WHAT IS GOOGLE BUYING?

[cripplecreek]

"Google declined to discuss employee campaign contributions"


They must be aware that a loss of conservative dollars could spell real problems for them. Anyone got any ideas about non Google search tools?

[ScottFromSpokane]

Boycott everything!

[MaineVoter2002]

As you may remember, Howard Dean was raising money illegally from Canada and Europe. This news was forgotten once Dean dropped out of the Presidential race. This may now be the norm in the DNC.

[wolfpat]

It looks like the Clintons and Reno taught Microsoft a lesson: Pay up or we'll make things hard on you.

[lilylangtree]

"Microsoft was the biggest tech donor, with its political action committee contributing $3.1 million last year, 60 percent to Democrats."

Who said Bill Gates wasn't a demoncRAT? (rhetorical)

[ArtimusCF]

Ok - now I am really confused... or maybe I just need my 3rd coffee. "indicated 98 percent of the money went to Democrats"... that does not seem right.

[Shortwave]

No "bleep." You can tell exactly where the Google dorks stand by doing an image search on "Bush" and "Kerry." The pictures that come up for the President paint him a bad light, but what would one expect from liberal scum.

[DoughtyOne]

Might I suggest...

http://www.altavista.com/

Any other search engine will do. I'll be modifying my useage of Google today.

[BibChr]

Well, that's pretty rough. NOTHING is as good as Google. And the new maps.google.com beats all the other map sites I've seen COLD.

Dan
/c8

[siunevada]

It's simple. They're so rich they are naturally guilty liberals. It makes them 'feel good' to hand out a few thousand of their millions to 'help' the disadvantaged because everyone knows the Dems help the disadvantaged.

I guess being brilliant in science doesn't make you brilliant the more mudane aspects of life. Like politics.

[spower]

Darn! I love my gmail account too!

[Free and Armed]

I never could figure out all the hype with Google. I've always used Yahoo! search engine and it works just fine.