Nutritional Info May Find Place on Menus

WTOP News ^ | February 14, 2005 | ANGELA DELLI SANTI, Associated Press Writer

[FoxInSocks]

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - Show a group of nutritionists a 10-ounce restaurant hamburger and a side order of onion rings and have them calculate the number of calories in the meal. Easy, right?

Well, not exactly. The food experts consistently underestimated the 1,550-calorie meal _ by an average of 685 calories _ in a study of 200 dietitians by the Center for Science in the Public Interest and New York University.

"If well-trained food professionals can't accurately estimate calorie content in a plate of food, you can be sure the average consumer is at a loss when looking at a menu," said Claudia Malloy of CSPI in Washington, D.C., which co-sponsored the study and is lobbying to force restaurants to provide nutrition information on the foods they serve.

New Jersey is among a half-dozen states considering food labeling laws for restaurants. Under a recent proposal in the New Jersey Assembly and pending in committee, chain and fast-food restaurants with 20 or more franchises would have to post calorie counts on menu boards _ Big Mac, 590 calories; Starbucks' grande cafe mocha, 400 calories _ and more extensive nutrition information, such as trans and saturated fats, salt and cholesterol, on menus.

Similar legislation is pending in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Illinois and Hawaii, and is expected to be reintroduced in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, though no state currently has such a law, Malloy said.

Many chain restaurants, from McDonald's to Subway, already make nutrition information available, although it's not always publicly posted.

Nutrition labeling bills may have gained momentum with the recent success of "Supersize Me," an Oscar-nominated documentary exposing the health risks of a fast-food diet, and publicity over a lawsuit blaming McDonald's for the obesity of teenage customers.

To the New Jersey Restaurant Association, such proposals amount to over-regulation for an industry already struggling to turn a profit.

"Our position is that the individual who is concerned about obesity should emphasize healthy lifestyle, personal responsibility, regular exercise and moderation," said Dale Florio, legislative counsel for the state restaurateurs. "Seventy-six percent of all meals are prepared at home. That's where nutrition has to start."

No one on either side of the issue believes posting calorie and fat content will produce drastic changes in what people eat. But proponents say such information could lead diners to make healthier selections and would provide sorely needed information to those with health problems who need special diets.

"When they purchase foods at restaurants, most people are using their instincts and their desire," said Daniel J. Hoffman, assistant professor of nutritional sciences at Cook College in New Brunswick. "This is a nice compromise between telling people what they should eat when they're out at a restaurant and giving them information so they have the power to choose.

"It's not going to drive them out of the ice cream store, but it may change what they buy," he said.

Hoffman said the added regulations are especially important because people eat out more often than ever, and people are getting fatter.

"This bill pushes informed choices," he said. "The misconception is that if you are overweight you are grossly over-consuming. One hundred calories extra each day over a decade will give you 50 pounds."

Assemblyman William D. Payne, an Essex Democrat who is co-sponsor of the New Jersey measure, said he is concerned about obesity and its related health consequences, especially among minorities. He partially blames convenience foods.

"Fast foods are available, they're cheaper than preparing meals at home," he said. "What's happened is the excessive calories have contributed to the problem of obesity. It's a crisis. Anything we can do to turn it around, we should do."

[FoxInSocks]

"When they purchase foods at restaurants, most people are using their instincts and their desire,"

And what's wrong with that? This will be another big waste of money, and it will bog down businesses with more reams of useless paperwork. And who wants a menu that reads like the side of a cereal box?

[HungarianGypsy]

Did you read last week about preschools that are no longer allowing the children to drink juice because studies say fruit juice can make children fat?

[Gingersnap]

"If well-trained food professionals can't accurately estimate calorie content in a plate of food, you can be sure the average consumer is at a loss when looking at a menu,"

Well, I didn't need to calculate the calories to know that if I ate everything on the plate, I'd better slow down at the other 2 meals.

[mlmr]

This is the equivilant of those little warning signs on the packs of cigarettes. It is a leftist socialist beachead on controlling your food intake.

[desert song]

The food experts consistently underestimated the 1,550-calorie meal _ by an average of 685 calories _ in a study of 200 dietitians . . . "If well-trained food professionals can't accurately estimate calorie content in a plate of food, you can be sure the average consumer is at a loss when looking at a menu," said Claudia Malloy of CSPI

Oh baloney Miss Claudia. The average consumer is probably smarter than the average dietician.