Posted on 02/14/2005 8:59:15 AM PST by Dan from Michigan
Bush Urges Renewal of Patriot Act
44 minutes ago White House - AP
By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - President Bush (news - web sites) on Monday urged Congress to reauthorize the USA Patriot Act, the Justice Department (news - web sites)'s widely criticized anti-terrorism law.
AP Photo
Reuters Slideshow: President Bush
"We must not allow the passage of time or the illusion of safety to weaken our resolve in this new war" on terrorism, Bush said at a swearing-in ceremony for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales at the Justice Department.
The president also argued that the Senate must give his nominees for the federal bench up-or-down votes without delay to fill vacancies in the courts.
The Patriot Act, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, bolstered FBI (news - web sites) surveillance and law-enforcement powers in terror cases, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado for months, and allowed secret proceedings in immigration cases.
Civil liberties groups and privacy advocates lambasted the law because they said it undermines freedom. But Bush said the act "has been vital to our success in tracking terrorists and disrupting their plans." He noted that many key elements of the law are set to expire at the end of the year and said Congress must act quickly to renew it.
The Patriot Act was pushed by Gonzales' predecessor, John Ashcroft (news - web sites), who was in the audience as Gonzales took his oath from Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor (news - web sites). Bush lauded Ashcroft's tireless efforts to make America safer as he oversaw a drop in violent crime besides his counterterrorism work.
Gonzales, who served as White House counsel during the last four years, said he would be a part of Bush's team but his first allegiance will be to the Constitution.
"I am confident that in the days and years ahead we in the department will work together tirelessly to address terrorism and other threats to our nation and to confront injustice with integrity and devotion to our highest ideals," Gonzales said.
Especially the judge shopping and sneak and peak provisions.
Question: How many American's rights have been violated because of this law? Please give specific examples. I'd like to research them...
It needs to be renewed, just as it is.
homeland security needs to have an exit strategy built into it, as well.
Another real problem I see with Patriot act (assault on the Constitution notwithstanding) is the follow-on repercussions. If, in 2008, a pinko-commie-nannystate-liberal-whacko ends up in the whitehouse, their enemies will be delivered unto them on a silver platter.
</tinfoil beanie>
LET IT SUNSET!
Top sends
That doesn't mean it shouldn't be renewed though.
So I can name 290,000,000 reasons there. If the law is there, it violates the constitution.
Made any bank transactions lately, of size say 5k?
I disagree..We are at war.
How? I want to find out more information about the specific loopholes and possible legal implications of making this act permanent.
Does anyone here want AG Schumer with this power going after gun groups, cause that's EXACTLY what's going to happen at some point if this is permanent.
Yes, I just did, in fact, this morning...
Congress never declared war.
So what if we get into a perpetual state of war. How much different is the War on Terror than the War on Drugs? What if we start getting into a war with China? There needs to be some light at the end of the tunnel where we don't need this act or a reduced form of it.
I'm trying to find out if it has EVER been successfully used for that purpose.
I think I heard Napolitano say on Fox News a few weeks ago that it has never been used for it's designed purpose. But had been used twice for the WOD.
I'd like to know if I heard that right.
The Patriot Act, passed in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, bolstered FBI (news - web sites) surveillance and law-enforcement powers in terror cases, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado for months, and allowed secret proceedings in immigration cases.
Civil liberties groups and privacy advocates lambasted the law because they said it undermines freedom. But Bush said the act "has been vital to our success in tracking terrorists and disrupting their plans."
Judge shopping is going on right now. Doesn't every ACLU case seem to find the most available liberal judge in the US for any reason other than terrorism right now?
I know for a fact that it was used in some Vegas case unrelated to terrorism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.