Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Transportation reform next on state's agenda (environmental reform, toll roads, housing)
Oakland Tribune ^ | 02/13/2005 | Sean Holstege

Posted on 02/13/2005 2:41:55 PM PST by calcowgirl

Transportation reform next on state's agenda
Fancy Bay Bridge not in the plan, environmental reform, toll roads are

State transportation secretary Sunne Wright McPeak returned to familiar ground when she laid out for the Oakland Chamber of Commerce her and her boss' ambitious vision to restore California's golden luster.

Her boss, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, is expected to reveal details of his "GoCalifornia" initiative any day. It will feature toll roads, converting some carpool lanes into tolled "HOT lanes," streamlining the state's environmental laws and promoting high-density housing in urban areas near mass transit.

On Friday, McPeak offered the clearest, most comprehensive articulation to date of Schwarzenegger's transportation, environmental and development reforms. It's a matter of California's economic competitiveness, she said.

"We have to start thinking of California as golden again. We must build our infrastructure, which we've neglected for decades," she said. "We've got to build the state. That's the business we are in. We are building the future of California."

The still vague GoCalifornia plan gave McPeak the opportunity to delve into an issue that has been a hallmark of her career, first as a Contra Costa County supervisor, then as leader of the Bay Area Economic Forum: the mismatch between where Californians live and where they work.

"If we do not interrupt the land-use patterns, even though we'll spend billions on transportation, $300 billion in the next 20 years, there will still be a doubling of congestion. That's unacceptable," McPeak said.

An infusion of new cash sources — private investment in toll roads and Indian gaming money — is the best way to do better, she said, promising to build in 10 years the highways and rail lines that normally take 20 years to complete.

McPeak noted that the rapid development of the Central Valley and other inland areas remote from job centers is gobbling up prime agricultural land, causing monster two-hour commutes, jamming up freeways and blocking the shipment of port cargo. "We've concluded that land-use pattern is dumb," McPeak said.

She announced that the administration will introduce legislation that will require each city to meet its housing needs for the next 20 years. McPeak did not offer specifics but did highlight the BART-to-San Jose project.

Santa Clara voters overwhelmingly passed a sales tax to raise $2 billion toward a southern extension from Fremont to San Jose. But the project is in doubt because the federal transit administration has not endorsed it and a state promise of $725 million appears to have evaporated with the sagging state budget.

"We're not going to put that kind of money up and have a parking lot on the Sunol Grade and Altamont Pass," McPeak said, noting that along the proposed route cities are 60,000 units short of their fair share of housing.

McPeak's central point: California faces a sharp housing crisis, caused by lack of supply. Supply can be remedied by better zoning and cities can be induced with state transportation money into making more land available for houses.

Improving the housing supply and building vital transportation links can be accomplished by loosening environmental laws. She told East Bay business leaders that $1 billion is spent every year on reports and lawsuits, not actually improving or protecting the state's ecology.

McPeak talked about the Bay Bridge fiasco, repeating past claims that a switch in design will save money and time, and warning, "If the Legislature proceeds with the (tower), be prepared for a time delay and, therefore, further cost increases."

Contact Sean Holstege at

sholstege@angnewspapers.com.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; calreform; gocalifornia; schwarzenegger; sunnemcpeak; taxes; tollroads; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2005 2:41:59 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

bttt


2 posted on 02/13/2005 2:44:06 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

bttt


3 posted on 02/13/2005 2:44:06 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; hedgetrimmer; NormsRevenge; tubebender; DoughtyOne; ...

Ping! Here we go!


4 posted on 02/13/2005 2:44:10 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

hahaha, two bumps for the price of one.


5 posted on 02/13/2005 2:44:31 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

This one is loaded, huh?


6 posted on 02/13/2005 2:44:43 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Lock and load.


7 posted on 02/13/2005 2:46:54 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulations. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Just curious, do you have any views on the proposal for new tollways?


8 posted on 02/13/2005 2:50:15 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Sprawl is caused by the obscene housing prices in California metro areas.

I really don't see that issue being seriously addressed in our lifetime.

I am retiring to West Texas. :-)
9 posted on 02/13/2005 2:54:01 PM PST by cgbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Tollways are increased taxes.

From what I've seen, current budgets have continued to bypass Proposition 42 funding of transportation (and are planning to do so for the next two years, according to the proposed "spending control" measure). It leaves us with highways in need of repair and is prohibiting the investment in new infrastructure.

The people of California have been consistently paying taxes to fulfill transportion needs. Unfortunately, Sacramento has continued to divert those funds to other social programs.

Now, they are going to make you pay again.


10 posted on 02/13/2005 3:00:21 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Well I can understand the problem with diversion of transportation funds. But are you sure that if there were no diversions, there would still be enough money to cover highway needs? Because if not, either:

1) the roads don't get built
2) increase taxes are needed for roadbuilding
3) toll financing provides a way to privatize roadbuilding and get them (and the users) to fund it instead of a tax increase (confiscation without choice.) However it is important that the state put the risk of default on the toll builder.

Perhaps hard to calculate given that so much money is diverted to transit(which almost never covers its operating costs), but I guess that was mentioned on the prop. initiative (though percentages or amounts likely were not, correct?) But I bet the diversions to non-transportation programs sure weren't ever mentioned on the ballot.


11 posted on 02/13/2005 3:17:27 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I think toll roads are a good idea, considering the impossibility of bringing true sanity to the state government.

As for the Bay Bridge--I guess they're just going to let it collapse like an accordion again. I'm sure that's better than withholding the monthly stipends from the San Francisco shopping-cart set.

12 posted on 02/13/2005 3:21:13 PM PST by Savage Beast (My parents, grandparents, and great grandparents were Democrats. My children are Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
This is Sustainable Development, brought to you by the United Nations, written by communists from Santa Cruz.

Apparently, Arnold is all for it.

13 posted on 02/13/2005 3:21:38 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Well tollways would definitely bring in enough money to take care of the budget problem for centuries with all the people on the roads out there (at least in so.cal).

And maybe than you all will get a taxcut. Sounds like you all need one bad.


14 posted on 02/13/2005 3:33:01 PM PST by stopem (Support the troops yellow ribbon purse-key-holders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stopem

CA need more roads and more lanes. Toll or not, it matters not. I can't think of anyplace where a new project can overcome the enviro's and the NIMBY crowd. CA roadbuilding days are over.


15 posted on 02/13/2005 3:37:39 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I'm not sure which part of California you're from, but Southern California's experience with toll roads was such a disaster that Tom McClintock (one of the only REAL Republicans left in that state), went from being a huge supporter of toll roads (particularly private ones) to a huge opponent - once he saw how the drivers and the state got shafted.

Checkout the LA Times article just less than halfway down on this site (and accept my apologies for using a left-wing site, but it's certainly better than having to pay to use the LA Times archive to retrieve it). The article was written in 2002, and, at the time, it was essentially an obituary on toll roads for California. So, trust your instincts on this, you're right.

http://bicycleaustin.info/rogerbaker/tollroad-failure.html


As an update on the above article, the Orange County Toll Roads are now charging right around 20 cents per mile, and have very little traffic (no coincidence there </sarcasm>), while the SR-91 (Riverside Freeway) toll lanes now charge 70 cents per mile at peak hours.

Arnold may not directly raise your taxes, but it will get ugly out there if you don't have copious amounts of cash (to borrow a California term).
16 posted on 02/13/2005 3:43:30 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Smart growth warehouses people, it doesn't improve the housing supply per se because someone has to subsidize all the smart growth housing they are building. Usually its the private individual who unknowingly buys a house for his neighbor when the cost is shifted to the price he is paying for his home. And they don't even get to pick the person they are buying the house for, the government does. Don't you think that gives the government way too much power over what is supposed to be a free market for housing?

If people knew how much smart growth was really costing America, they would revolt!

We have a smart growth development going in, in Santa Cruz County that will be 300 apartments, 700 sq feet with no kitchen. They will share a communal kitchen.

This is right in line with the UNs biodiversity treaty. It says if they are to allow us to stay an industrialized society, only a billion people should be allowed on the planet. If we want to keep our friends and family alive, we have to revert to a peasant society-- no kitchens is very medieval, doncha think"
****
Posted by hedgetrimmer to pbrown
On News/Activism 02/04/2005 10:48:14 PM PST · 420 of 784


The Global Biodiversity treaty has already decided how many humans should be allowed to live on the planet.

1.An agricultural society - "in which most human beings are
peasants ... should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people..."

2.An industrialized world society - "at the North American standard of living ... would be 1 billion."

3.Semi-industrialized society - As the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.


17 posted on 02/13/2005 3:48:46 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; TapTheSource
McPeak said, noting that along the proposed route cities are 60,000 units short of their fair share of housing.

What the heck is this woman talking about? What the heck happened to the free market? The state can't decide how many houses should be built and who should live in them and who should pay for them, unless you are talking about the Soviet Union, but the USSR is supposed to be dead, isn't it?
18 posted on 02/13/2005 3:51:28 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Sprawl is caused by the obscene housing prices in California metro areas is caused by government controlling the housing market through smart growth, shifting the cost of buying "affordable housing" to the price an individual pays for his home, so-called growth limits that force infill development and uncomfortable densities in industrial and business districts, the list goes on and on.

Go ahead and move to texas, but if your town ever gets a "visioning team" to tell you how to "preserve your open space" you will lose your town too.
19 posted on 02/13/2005 3:55:01 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

You've heard of governor Moonbeam. If Schwarzenegger keeps it up, he's going to be known as governor Lowbeam.


20 posted on 02/13/2005 4:00:03 PM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson