Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

People in the News (Cheech & Chong)
Findlaw.com ^ | February 13, 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 02/13/2005 11:35:17 AM PST by kennedy

ASPEN, Colo. (AP) - Cheech and Chong may have joked about marijuana in their movies, but the comedians say they didn't touch the stuff when the cameras were rolling.

"We tried one time and we wasted so much film," said Tommy Chong, recalling a scene in "Up in Smoke." "We were in the car waiting for the cue, you know. And the camera's rolling and we're sitting there, you know, and neither one of us heard the cue."

Chong and former partner Cheech Marin appeared together for the first time in 20 years at the U.S. Comedy Arts Festival.

Chong said he isn't ashamed of introducing millions of Vietnam-era kids to marijuana. "When you think of how many kids died drinking alcohol, I feel I've saved millions of lives," he said.

Marin said their humor was appreciated by an unexpected group: "Cops were our biggest fans. Because they dealt in what we were dealing with everyday, but in reality... they saw the essential humor and they laughed."

Marin and Chong, who recently completed a nine-month sentence for trying to sell marijuana pipes on the Internet, said they are writing two new films, "Grumpy Old Stoners" and "Lord of the Smoke."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: cheech; chong; davesnothereman; donutwatch; whytheycallitdope; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Drew68
Was it so wrong for Chong to sell that bong? Why can't we all just get along?

Was the bong oblong, like a dong? Such conduct does not belong, and we must not, um, prolong.

41 posted on 02/13/2005 2:19:03 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

Chong really got screwed. Good to see they are working on a new film. Cheech and Chong are the most under-rated living comedians. They should be elevated to the status of Laurel and Hardy. It was horrifying that cheech ended up on the 'golden girls.' Reminded me of the old story of how moe from the three stooges ended up as a messenger on the studio lot (only not as tragic - at least cheech probably made a lot of cash). I hope they have a rennaisance soon if they can get their projects off the ground.


42 posted on 02/13/2005 2:26:14 PM PST by orangelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
When the War On (non-government-approved) Drugs brigade thought they could get free publicity by locking up Tommy Chong.

That's pretty sad if that's all there is to this story. What a wonderful use of federal resources, railroad Tommy Chong and lock him up for selling something I can go buy legally at any number of places in smalltown USA.

43 posted on 02/13/2005 2:47:29 PM PST by Nexus6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nexus6
That's pretty sad if that's all there is to this story.

That was all I could ever find - prosecuted & incarcerated for selling water pipes over the Internet...the exact same type of pipe that can be used with tobacco.

No prosecution for the small amount of pot that was found.

For that, the man went to jail for 9 months - a longer sentence than some have been given for robbery or rape.

44 posted on 02/13/2005 3:14:13 PM PST by MamaTexan (It's not about God...it's about FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Yep. Just Googled the story, that's pretty much all there is to it. He apparently owned a company with his son that manufactured and distributed glass pipes, then sold them on the net. The Feds apparently found some little-used law that prohibits shipping paraphernalia across state lines. They had there agents put in a massive order and he took the bait, then raided his home and threw the book at him. Totally absurd, he was entrapped.


45 posted on 02/13/2005 4:04:32 PM PST by Nexus6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: kennedy
"When you think of how many kids died drinking alcohol, I feel I've saved millions of lives,"

I think that number is an overestimate, but his point is valid: the legal drug alcohol is a killer, unlike marijuana.

46 posted on 02/13/2005 5:43:03 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
"Has anyone else found the power to tell the people what they can posses or ingest in the Constitution?"

Here ya go. Educate yourself. I'm getting tired of you asking this question in every thread -- now you know the answer.

Interstate Commerce: National Prohibitions and State Police Power
"The earliest such acts were in the nature of quarantine regulations and usually dealt solely with interstate transportation. In 1884, the exportation or shipment in interstate commerce of livestock having any infectious disease was forbidden. In 1903, power was conferred upon the Secretary of Agriculture to establish regulations to prevent the spread of such diseases through foreign or interstate commerce. In 1905, the same official was authorized to lay an absolute embargo or quarantine upon all shipments of cattle from one State to another when the public necessity might demand it. A statute passed in 1905 forbade the transportation in foreign and interstate commerce and the mails of certain varieties of moths, plant lice, and other insect pests injurious to plant crops, trees, and other vegetation. In 1912, a similar exclusion of diseased nursery stock was decreed, while by the same act and again by an act of 1917, the Secretary of Agriculture was invested with powers of quarantine on interstate commerce for the protection of plant life from disease similar to those above described for the prevention of the spread of animal disease."

Congress has the power to regulate commerce among the states. That power to regulate includes the power to prohibit.

Deal with it. You don't like the law, change it.

47 posted on 02/14/2005 5:12:34 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Another fan of The Princess Bride.
48 posted on 02/14/2005 5:19:08 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Know your rights
"but his point is valid: the legal drug alcohol is a killer, unlike marijuana."

So it is your contention that if marijuana were legal, people would switch from alcohol to marijuana, thereby "saving lives"?

This is contrary to your previous statements that teens would smoke less if marijuana were no longer the "forbidden fruit".

Have people switched from alcohol to pot in the Netherlands where pot is legal? Do you have anything at all to support your contention?

49 posted on 02/14/2005 5:36:45 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: libertyman
making marijuana legal again

Thank you for pointing out the "again" part. There are those who don't know the history of how the bureaucratic a**es of the department that enforced Prohibition were saved in order to protect America from the evils of hemp.

50 posted on 02/14/2005 5:54:52 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gracie1

May I see your license?

My license? Uhh..it's on the bumper man back there.


51 posted on 02/14/2005 6:03:43 AM PST by stbdside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; libertyman
Congress has the power to regulate commerce among the states.

Yep, Interstate Commerce, like commerce between the states, (i.e.) The State of Texas and the State of New York, which are political subdivisions.

It has nothing to do with the physical boundaries of the geographical locations also known as *States*, OR the people.

It's why the Constitution enumerates our right to UNLIMITED private contract, as well as prohibiting the government from passing laws that impair obligation of contracts.

Educate yourself.

No YOU need to educate yourself and back away from the altar of the State.

I'm getting tired of you asking this question in every thread

Free country here, Bud. I can post that question until hell freezes over, and don't give a fat rat's a$$ whether YOU like it or not.

You don't like the law, change it.

I like the law just fine. It's idiots that think government is God (but actually don't have a clue to what the law IS) that hack me off.

52 posted on 02/14/2005 6:06:41 AM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a *legal entity*!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kennedy

"quick man, eat this.......it's only an ambulance"


53 posted on 02/14/2005 6:07:25 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Dave's not here.


54 posted on 02/14/2005 6:08:42 AM PST by rabidralph (Congratulations, Pres. Bush and VP Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gracie1

Leslie Horwinkle...... Bailiff....


55 posted on 02/14/2005 6:10:18 AM PST by showme_the_Glory (No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan; robertpaulsen

You need to be aware that, from my communications w/ RobertPaulsen, the Drug War is God. He doesn't seem to care what the Constitution says about the federal government's authority for fighting crime, 'cuz he has an agenda of his own.

Yes, he IS correct that Congress has the responsibility to regulate commerce among the states...the US was intended to be a free trade zone, & the federal government's role was to ensure that states wouldn't discriminate betw which other states they will trade w/, or tax their citizens when buying products from out-of-state--but there is a HUGE difference betw "among" & "WITHIN", which seems to make little difference to him. After all, the Drug War worshippers will twist the words of the Constitution into whatever meaning supports their agenda, regardless of what the Founding Fathers intended, because original intent is the obstacle preventing them from achieveing their goal honestly.

When THAT doesn't work, they begin to use court rulings, saying, "Well, in such & such a yr, the Supreme Court said..." (hmmmm...haven't I heard THAT before--by liberals especially? Example: saying the Constitution provides for "the separation of church & state", etc., etc., etc.).

I wonder if you caused RP to paint himself into a corner when he said to you "I'm getting tired of you asking this question in every thread". What was the question: could the question have been about the constitutionality of the Drug War, or something about its utter failure??? Ya see, it seems like when most of their other options run out, they will either try to change the subject, mention their disdain for bringing the subject up in the 1st place, or revert to personal insults....just ANOTHER case of "where have I heard THIS before?"! It's deja-vu all over again!

It's all agenda-driven, & is based on lies that are used to undermine America, individual liberty, the Founding Fathers, & our Constitution...all in the name of protecting us from ourselves & increasing the power of the federal government into one that will eventually become all-knowing & all-powerful: one in which we will no longer be able to buy or sell w/o having government permission or an ID (on or right hand or forehead, like the Bible says???).


56 posted on 02/14/2005 12:04:17 PM PST by libertyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Excellent!

I still have my "Big Bambu" album with the giant rolling paper in it.

Los cochinos!

57 posted on 02/14/2005 12:11:15 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The New England Patriots. 2005 World Football Champions. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
And yes, it was a classic episode.

RI got a good laugh when the Chong character asked the Marin character what his current drug of choice was and he replied, Rogaine.

58 posted on 02/14/2005 12:27:15 PM PST by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
... Deal with it. You don't like the law, change it.

We are and that's why you have a brownshirt weegee.

59 posted on 02/14/2005 12:35:05 PM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

Have to agree. I don't smoke the stuff, and don't condone anyone else doing it, but he got shafted.

BTW: "Cheech and Chong's Greatest Hit" has to be one of the funniest albums ever.


60 posted on 02/14/2005 12:40:07 PM PST by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("Oh no, not Hans Brix!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson