Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wal-Mart Chief Defends Closing Unionized Store: Scott Says Labor Costs Guided Quebec Decision
The Washington Post ^ | February 11, 2005 | Michael Barbaro

Posted on 02/11/2005 1:58:23 PM PST by quidnunc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: sphinx
I'm in Canada. Unless she works for the French or German postal services, which is a different thing. He did say 16 weeks. :-(
81 posted on 02/12/2005 4:16:12 AM PST by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Wal-Mart's decision has infuriated the United Food and Commercial Workers union, which was negotiating a contract for the Quebec store's 190 employees. If it had succeeded, the store would have become the only Wal-Mart store in North America with a union contract.

"Wal-Mart is trying to send a message to the rest of their employees that if they join a union the same thing could happen to them," said Michael J. Fraser, the union's national director in Canada. Fraser said the union plans to file unfair labor practice charges against the chain with the Quebec Labor Relations Commission.

Hey! I've got an idea! Have the UFCW union BUY the store from Walmart, and then run it themselves! Show Walmart how a profitable store should be run! Yeah, the union could certainly turn a profit in that store!

Mark

82 posted on 02/12/2005 4:19:03 AM PST by MarkL (That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Oh -- well, if it's Canada, 16 weeks is pretty Spartan. I thought the Canadian/European standard was a six hour day with siesta, plus a comp day for every day you showed up to work.


83 posted on 02/12/2005 4:20:35 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The upside of unions is when the company has a great team of workers that is an important part of the company's strength. When they bargain reasonably with the interests of the company at heart, then they are a force that actually helps advance the company. When you get instead idiotic rules about who can replace a lightbulb or why a malingerer cannot be fired, then they injure a company.

No kidding! I was doing some work on computers at a military ammunition plant run by a corporation under contract for the government... Once I had diagnosed the computer, and decided that it needed a new network card, I was not allowed to install it! The network card had to be installed by one of the plant electricians, and he had to sign off on the paperwork!

Mark

84 posted on 02/12/2005 4:33:35 AM PST by MarkL (That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
My company has a stamping plant in Shelbyville KY which employs 700- 800 employees and last weekend they had a walkout. We were prepared to weather the storm, bussed down some volunteers to work production and were in the process of hiring temps.

Since the plant provides the regional Ford plant with Explorer body parts, they stepped in and told mgt. to settle or else...... They were not going to allow themselves to be shut down simply because we would not have been unable to supply them with parts.

I don't know what the new agreement with the union entails but it ain't good for our company considering the millions in losses we have experienced of the last couple years and no new work coming in...........

Competition in the stamping industry is tough as hell and Ford just made it tougher for us...............

As a side note, production workers at that plant are averaging over $60,000 per year with overtime, some making in excess of $80,000......... Not too bad for that part of the country

85 posted on 02/12/2005 4:54:38 AM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
"I suspect..."

On what evidence?

The duck is in the cellar.

Next time - quote a little of the previous message, please?

As for someone else's suggestion, I second the motion. These unions are fat on forced membership dues and whatever kickbacks. Why not ask the question - why can't you (Canadian union) simply buy the store? Why can't you run said store at a profit? Why can't you? Should anyone attempt such answers, they might reveal much about the modern business of, unions.

86 posted on 02/12/2005 11:36:05 AM PST by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

I had a golfing friend who worked as a mailman for twenty years and retired. He had accumulated a lot of sick time, was given credit for all of it and paid for it. His retirement pay was excellent, better than mine and I did 36 years in a big company. Gummint pay is pretty good but their retirement pay is terrific. The new postal rates are due anytime now. Someone has to pay for their hard work.


87 posted on 02/12/2005 6:29:53 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

How many decades ago was that accomplished by unions? They like to talk about how they got child labor laws, too. But that was nearly a century ago. I am talking about the here and now. The Democrat party used to stand for something good and honorable... a long, long time ago. Both organizations are putrid cesspools now.


88 posted on 02/13/2005 12:49:25 PM PST by EricT. (Join the Soylent Green Party...We recycle dead environmentalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

$60K per year for feeding sheetmetal into a press?!? Holy cow! Why did I bother to get educated? You could train monkeys to do that kind of work.


89 posted on 02/13/2005 1:02:45 PM PST by EricT. (Join the Soylent Green Party...We recycle dead environmentalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

I agree totally. In all the 40 years I have worked in many different jobs, I have seen very few places where the Employer wouldn't bend over backward to keep a productive, dependable employee. If they are not smart enough to do that then you might as well move on because they will not be in business long. Just my thoughts.


90 posted on 02/13/2005 4:56:06 PM PST by Desparado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson