Skip to comments.
Scandal Puts Focus On Role of Bloggers (WaPo on FR, NCPAC and MD4Bush)
Washington Post ^
| 02/11/05
| David Snyder and Matthew Mosk
Posted on 02/10/2005 10:41:44 PM PST by conservative in nyc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 701-709 next last
To: beyond the sea
I remember Sarah McClendon, her writings. Which admin banned her? Or was it the press "credentialing" corp? Or pressies?
Yep.. lol. "Peasants in PJs".
But this then raises a very serious question: If a Freep Poster posts while being nude, can anyone who reads his post file "indecent exposure" charges against him? File "creating environment charges"? "Sexual Harassment"? (grinning, running, and ducking) I mean... I look at that O'Mally/NCPAC stuff, and I wonder...
481
posted on
02/11/2005 7:12:22 AM PST
by
Alia
To: conservative in nyc
...flaws in documents CBS News used in a report or how about:
"CBS News attempting to influence a presidential election by promoting fraudulent documents provided by the DNC!"
To: Lazamataz
And people wonder why I prefer and enjoy my status as low profile 'nobody'.
483
posted on
02/11/2005 7:12:42 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Red Sun rising, Drown without inhaling. Within, the dark holds hard. Higher than hope my cure lies.)
To: anniegetyourgun
It could be harmless .. or it could be not
Time will tell .. they always out themselves after a while
484
posted on
02/11/2005 7:13:30 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
To: international american
My pleasure. Thank you. :^)
485
posted on
02/11/2005 7:15:36 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: conservative in nyc
The Washington Post calls you "a reclusive California conservative", Jim. Hardly consider Jim Robinson reclusive ... going back to the Fall of 1998 (October 31)FreeRepublic staged a very well attended March for Justice rally on the Mall in Washington. Attendance was estimated to be somewhere in the vicinity of 5 thousand (that would be touted as a half million if it were any other group), with FReepers coming from nearly every state in the Union. The 'reclusive' Jim Robinson was very much in evidence, giving a welcome speech on a stage erected for the event. He was just one of many featured speakers. The March for Justice rally was covered in its entirety by C-SPAN and virtually ignored by the Washington Post.
486
posted on
02/11/2005 7:16:45 AM PST
by
BluH2o
To: Alia
Is it possible this is all stemming from past resentments from those in the liberal coalitions against conservative bloggers/websites? The publicizing of "aggregious offenders" in MSM or MSM articles or non-MSM articles email addresses? or phone numbers? Could be. This could all be the MSM's way of payback, by quoting posters in here and then "doing digging" to find out their "Guckert" (Guckart?) More than possible, highly likely. They've been exposed on numerous occasions as highly biased to the left, even to the deteriment of our country...they withhold information they otherwise wouldn't if that information would hurt the liberal agenda; they publish information that they otherwise wouldn't if it would hurt the liberal agenda; if it hurst the conservative agenda, they publish information, knowing full way that they haven't verified their sources or know that their sources have an ax to grind, making it glaringly obivious they are using an otherwise questionable source....as we saw in the Rathergate episode, for instance.
To: Mo1
Who is Michael Olesker? Did he just slip up here -- BIG TIME? Or is he just wrong about MD4BUSH's identity?
Could be that or he could have heard a rumor
It would be a little ironic having a columnist spread a rumor in a column decrying rumor-mongering.
My best guess is this Olesker guy's just sloppy. According to research by kcvl on this thread (in the 200s), Governor Ehrlich thinks he's been misquoted by this guy before.
To: bitt
thanks for the ping. need some coffee. My pleasure.
Have a cup while you Freep ! |
489
posted on
02/11/2005 7:18:20 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: conservative in nyc
Sorry, I meant to put a caveat in the post, but my anger got the best of me.
490
posted on
02/11/2005 7:18:34 AM PST
by
clyde260
(Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
To: conservative in nyc
It would be a little ironic having a columnist spread a rumor in a column decrying rumor-mongering I was joking around
My mistake and should have put a (*L*) after my comment :0)
491
posted on
02/11/2005 7:20:39 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
To: TheForceOfOne
Many very explicit and pointed comments were made by me and others in August and September surrounding the time of the SwiftVets, and in conjunction with that incident, as to how this is now a true battle between the Old Media and the New Media.
I meant it then, and I hope everyone here understands that.
Only one will remain standing at the end of this battle.
492
posted on
02/11/2005 7:22:20 AM PST
by
AFPhys
((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
To: conservative in nyc; Pharmboy; Jim Robinson
Yikes!
Of course I meant MD4Bush!
If MD4Bush is still here management should simply ask him if he's a plant.
We may not get an honest answer but a non-response would be very suspicious.
493
posted on
02/11/2005 7:22:49 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: Alia
But this then raises a very serious question: If a Freep Poster posts while being nude, can anyone who reads his post file "indecent exposure" charges against him?Oh, Alia, I'm blushing.
;-)
I'll get the handcuffs.
Seriously, if you run across more threads on this topic, feel free to ping me. This is a very important matter over the next years.
494
posted on
02/11/2005 7:23:18 AM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Barbara Boxer is Barbra Streisand on peyote ......and is the north end of a south bound mule.)
To: Lazamataz
Laz -- I think yours is excellent: with only one exception. Your rules are applicable to everyone regardless of their being "high profile" or not. Take for example, that couple that was roughed up by Union Thugs. These are not "high profile"; but yet, given the current status of the MSM/Dem/Liberal mindset, if this couple had posted on, say, a thread blasting AFL-CIO, I've no doubts Union lawyers would try to use it as "See! This couple went specifically to that even with "chaos" on their minds". Again, your rules are applicable to EVERYONE in this forum.
And given that IP numbers are available, it shouldn't be too hard to track TROLLS, either.
Either a sensible discussion, a panel with MSM, bloggers, freepers takes place, or it becomes a civil war; which is of course what Liberals really want. In the liberal mindset, they'd like nothing better: War on American Soil. And because "evil" America deserves it. Dittos on their same "want" in cyber, and in re the news.
Nothing more, just yet, to add to your list.
495
posted on
02/11/2005 7:27:12 AM PST
by
Alia
To: SkyPilot
496
posted on
02/11/2005 7:27:23 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
497
posted on
02/11/2005 7:29:01 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
To: conservative in nyc
Olesker is despised by many as a total loser. Vile leftist reporting at its worst. The Baltimore Sun like the NY Slimes finds itself in a circulation decline. As people become better informed due to the "New Media" old liberal rags find it harder and harder to push their dribble on the masses. Another dinosaur in its death throws.
498
posted on
02/11/2005 7:30:00 AM PST
by
TheForceOfOne
(Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
To: Lazamataz
"No, could I task you with this? I have a few irons in the fire already. Summarize what has occured, and point Matt to this thread."
Consider it done.
499
posted on
02/11/2005 7:31:19 AM PST
by
Rokke
To: MeekOneGOP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 701-709 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson