Posted on 02/10/2005 10:41:44 PM PST by conservative in nyc
The Web site began as a sort of Internet boutique for like-minded conservatives and libertarians, suspicious of federal power and angry at President Bill Clinton.
Started in 1997 by a reclusive California conservative, freerepublic.com saw its membership blossom with Clinton's impeachment and the election of George W. Bush. Attention to the site reached a zenith last fall, when a "freeper" -- the group's moniker for its bloggers -- first discussed flaws in documents CBS News used in a report critical of Bush's National Guard service.
---Snip---
One participant working under the handle MD4BUSH, whose identity is unknown, drew Steffen into a private conversation and appeared to coax him to share more details about his role in spreading the rumor. Copies of those chat room e-mails were later provided to The Washington Post.
The Oct. 18 conversation began with MD4BUSH complimenting Steffen and saying how obvious it was that the rumors about the mayor were true. Steffen, writing under the name NCPAC, replied:
"I don't look for the MO'M [O'Malley] story to hit for a little bit yet. . . . However, a lot of what everyone knows about MO'M is because of work that has occurred. It's been a wild ride."
MD4BUSH later probed further:
"Your saying that my dentist knows [about the rumors] because of work you did? Wow, I must say, I'm impressed. I mean really, everyone knows -- how did that happen?"
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
It wouldn't necessarily take a hacker to do it.
Here is a plausible scenario: Perhaps the original MD4Bush was not the same MD4Bush from a few days ago - but the second MD4Bush used the same computer, surfed to FreeRepublic, found that the original MD4Bush account was already logged on and contained his old email.
It could be that simple - but it would be a violation of the ECPA because MD4Bush #2 was not a party to the original communication.
There are other questions (perhaps already answered?) - how did MD4Bush obtain NCPAC's identity?
I have a few ideas. But, gosh, I'm too close to
those sources to reveal any more at the moment. [irony]
And the WaPo has since changed the article's headline to "Uproar Brings Focus on Role Of Bloggers".
NCPAC dropped sufficient hints in this forum that anyone who really wanted to could have figured out his identity. He made some posts identifying him as close to Governor Ehrlich, and his screen name would allow any reporter with half a brain to narrow down the list of who he was.
Loose lips sink ships.
Apparently the Washington Post confirmed his identity by calling and asking, but if I recall correctly, the article did not explain how the preliminary identification was made. Did NCPAC provide his name in one of the emails, or was it determined by technical means?
Someone needs to do an article on what has been going on with liberal journalists and news organizations going after conservative bloggers and websites. Like to see those emails chatting that up.
PING to clandestine activity....
Very true.
I've been thinking this sort of thing must be happening for years.
I go back to before Donald Segretti and his dirty tricks and mischief. To be honest, this kind of thing must be happening.
:-)
My first post is 19 ..and I haven't left..What is sleep, anyhow?
Heck, they are replaying the Hillary Playbook - Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy. Some things never change.
You could probably find all of that information in Sidney Blumenthal's emails.
RIGHT-on, SkyPilot.
How about another one? The incredible Vince Foster who got to Fort Marcy Park a couple hours before his car?
Patrick Knowlton....
You rang?
And Ehrlich beat a Kennedy. I guess Bob Shrum is looking for work again. Maybe he found it.
I think FR is fabulous, as other other forums. And sometimes, good things happen like Buckhead. But for any credible journalist to 'trust' a post from a public forum is just bad journalism, period. Seems the need to get the scoop means throwing all credibility out the window. It's not the credibility of FR either. It's the jackasses at these newspapers who fall into these rumor traps.
"when a "freeper" -- the group's moniker for its bloggers"
Bloggers? Now I have to change the monogram on my PJ's.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.