[killermosquito]

Evolution is the fairy tale.

Which is more simplistic, to believe that something was created from nothing by nothing for nothing or that everything was created by SOMEONE? If creation is simplistic it is because evolution is impossible.

Has the scientific community been able to create on purpose what it claims was created by accident? The answer is clearly NO.

I watched a show about ocean searchs for ancient civilizations and the explorer said that the first thing that they look for when they examine underwater images is right angles because they don't exist naturally in nature. If right angles provide evidence for the existence of ancient civilizations then what are we if not evidence for a benevolent all-powerful creator?

[Kurt_D]

Which is more simplistic, to believe that something was created from nothing by nothing for nothing or that everything was created by SOMEONE?

Prove the existence of that SOMEONE. ;)

[Fester Chugabrew]

If right angles provide evidence for the existence of ancient civilizations then what are we if not evidence for a benevolent all-powerful creator?

Blockheads.

[Dimensio]

Which is more simplistic, to believe that something was created from nothing by nothing

Evolution is not "something from nothing".

or that everything was created by SOMEONE?

What "SOMEONE"? How does this "SOMEONE" operate? What are its methods? What are its motives? How did it come to exist and how did it come to be in a position to create?

If creation is simplistic it is because evolution is impossible.

Demonstrating that evolution is impossible -- which you have not done -- would not validate any specific creation account.