Design for Living: The Basis for a Design Theory of Origins

Discovery Institute ^ | February 7, 2005 | Michael Behe

[bondserv]

Still, some critics claim that science by definition can't accept design, while others argue that science should keep looking for another explanation in case one is out there. But we can't settle questions about reality with definitions, nor does it seem useful to search relentlessly for a non-design explanation of Mount Rushmore. Besides, whatever special restrictions scientists adopt for themselves don't bind the public, which polls show, overwhelmingly, and sensibly, thinks that life was designed. And so do many scientists who see roles for both the messiness of evolution and the elegance of design.

[SunkenCiv]

---

Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution by Michael J. Behe hardcover online supplement	The Battle of Beginnings: Why Neither Side Is Winning the Creation-Evolution Debate by Delvin Lee "Del" Ratzsch

---