Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks

There has been no proof one way or another about the causality or the changeability of homosexual orientation. The question for me is, was he exercising his freedom of speech as an individual, in which case this is fine, or was he sending the information in his official capacity, in which case I'm not sure it's appropriate.


21 posted on 02/09/2005 10:09:56 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Unam Sanctam
I've found a sure fire method for determining what the left believes constitute freedom of speech.

1. Agree with speech = ok
2. disagree with speech = not ok
24 posted on 02/09/2005 10:13:29 AM PST by Mulch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
There has been no proof one way or another about the causality or the changeability of homosexual orientation.

"Changeability" has been proved, Dr. Robert Spitzer, the APA shrink responsible for removing homosexuality from the DSM, has research that confirms change is possible.

27 posted on 02/09/2005 10:18:37 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
There has been no proof one way or another about the causality or the changeability of homosexual orientation.

Actually there are thousands of ex-homosexuals. I'd call that proof

57 posted on 02/09/2005 1:08:33 PM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson