Another example: The human genome permanently contains roughly *20,000* (not a typo) different sections of "fossilized viruses" (known technically as ERVs, or Endogenous RetroViruses). These are relics of failed viral infections which took place in our long-ago ancestors and then passed down to us in our DNA.
Retroviruses are a class of viruses which reproduce themselves by actually inserting their own DNA "inline" into the genomic DNA of the infected host. Normally the viral reproduction cycle then kills the cell so infected, but at times a virus will "fumble" the insertion and just leave a "broken" copy of itself permanently stuck in the host's DNA. If this happens to occur in a cell in the host's germ line (like a sperm or egg cell, or the cells which produce sperm/eggs), then the inactive virus "stuck" in the DNA will be *inherited* by the resulting offspring and be found in the DNA of *all* of his/her cells. And then subsequently passed along to each subsequent generation ad infinitum.
Here's the really fun part: lots of the ERVs in our DNA were not originally contracted by one of our human ancestors, but by one of our PRE-HUMAN ancestors. How do we know this? Because the exact same ERVs (same basepair sequence, same "fragmenting", exact *same* basepair insertion point) are found in various *non-human* genomes, indicating that both lineages inherited that specific ERV from a COMMON ANCESTOR, before the evolutionary split which eventually resulted in humans and the other species.
Here, for example, is the "map" of some of the ERVs found in humans which are also found in various other groupings of primates:
(Each labeled arrow on the chart shows an ERV shared in common by all the branches to the right, and *not* the branches that are "left-and-down". This is the pattern that common descent would make. And common descent is the *only* plausible explanation for it. Furthermore, similar findings tie together larger mammal groups into successively larger "superfamilies" of creatures all descended from even earlier common ancestors.)
Notice how the pattern of "shared nesting" based on shared ERVs *alone* just "happens" to look exactly like the branching ancestry pattern which evolutionary biology arrived at by other lines of evidence... What a "mere coincidence", eh?
No, there are other plausible explanations. Code fragments in computer software can be found in widely different applications, for instance (e.g. MS Word, MS Excel), yet we KNOW for a fact that MS Word and MS Excel were designed "intelligently," not evolved unaided.
Another plausible explanation is simply that species caught the same viri on their own. It's not outrageous to think that both a monkey and a human caught colds or got infections in open wounds...acts that have nothing to do with any purported "shared" ancestry.