Posted on 02/06/2005 5:48:12 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
Females in the Laupala genus detect tiny differences in the pulse rates of male courtship songs, which differ from one Laupala species to the next. They refuse to mate with males of other species, thus promoting the formation of new species.
The scientists say their findings shed light on the role of individual choices in the evolution of species and the growth of biodiversity.
“Animals with nervous systems and brains have preferences and can make choices,” says Tamra Mendelson, an evolutionary biologist at Lehigh. “Changes in these preferences and choices appear to drive speciation.
“That raises the question: Can something seemingly so individual as a choice have macro-evolutionary consequences in terms of increasing biodiversity? If so, this affects how life on the planet looks. The more species you have, the more complex the ecology is going to be.”
In down-to-earth terms:
“What turns a female cricket on? Why does she prefer one pulse rate over another? Whatever the reason, it’s very important that she exercise this preference in order to keep the species distinct.”
Mendelson spent three and one-half years studying the Laupala cricket with Kerry Shaw, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Maryland.
An explosion of crickets
The thumbnail-sized Laupala spawns new species at the rate of 4.17 every one million years, or more than 10 times faster than the average speciation rate for invertebrates. This rapid evolution is contributing to an “explosion” of new cricket species, especially on Hawaii, the largest and youngest island in the Hawaiian archipelago, say the two scientists. Some 38 different species of the cricket now inhabit the island chain.
Among all animals, say Mendelson and Shaw, only the African cichlid fish spawns new species more quickly.
While early biologists based their estimates of speciation rates on morphological, or structural characteristics, Mendelson says, scientists today are more likely to use genetic data to come up with estimates.
Closely related species of Laupala have no clear morphological differences, Mendelson says. They are similar in appearance, they have similar diets, and they live in similar habitats. Members of closely related species possess no physiological differences that would prevent them from interbreeding.
But closely related species are distinguished by subtle differences in the pulse rates of male crickets’ simple courtship songs, a secondary sexual trait that plays a large role in mate attraction.
Among all species of Laupala, the pulse rate of male courtship songs ranges from .5 to 4.2 pulses per second. Female crickets can detect these differences, says Mendelson, and they tend to hop towards the pulse rate of their own species and to reject songs sung at a different tempo.
The Laupala mating ritual lasts up to eight hours and consists of eight to 15 transfers of spermatophores between male and female, says Mendelson. The final spermatophore, or capsule, to be transferred contains the actual sperm cells that impregnate the female.
Singing a new song
As a species begins to split into two separate species, says Mendelson, “the songs appear to be the first characteristic that changes.”
During the early part of the speciation process, says Mendelson, crickets of the two emerging lines interbreed. After a point, however, members of the two distinct species no longer mate with each other.
This discovery led Mendelson to name one of her graduate-school papers after the pop song “Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow?” The Nature article was given the more conservative title of “Rapid Speciation in an Arthropod.”
“Over time,” says Mendelson, “lineages – species that have split – cease to recognize each other as mates. Although the ancestors recognized each other as mates, the descendants no longer do because of evolutionary change. In the case of Laupala, members of the two species are physiologically capable of mating. But they appear to lose the desire to interbreed before they lose the capacity to interbreed.”
Mendelson and Shaw used a technique called amplified fragment-length polymorphisms to establish the evolutionary tree, or phylogeny, of the Laupala. They based their estimates of the cricket’s rate of speciation on the Laupala’s phylogeny and on the age of the islands in the Hawaiian archipelago. The youngest island, Hawaii, was formed less than 500,000 years ago.
--Kurt Pfitzer
Posted on Thursday, February 3, 2005
The thumbnail-sized Laupala spawns new species at the rate of 4.17 every one million years, or more than 10 times faster than the average speciation rate for invertebrates.
This bears repeating: a speciation rate of 4.17 new species every 1 million years is very, very fast, indeed, 10 times faster than the average speciation rate for invertebrates. It's no wonder that we're not witnessing new species proliferating all around us (as some would claim ought to be happening). By human standards of time reckoning, evolution is an achingly slow process.
Worth noting, too, is the fact that Tamra Mendelson and her co-investigator, Kerry Shaw, spent three-and-one-half years studying the Laupala cricket.
Ping
Perhaps the writer meant 'non-vertebrate'? Anyway, thanks...
Right, humans have accelerated evolution in many ways (antibiotic-resistant bacteria also come to mind, not to mention domesticated animals and the like). I suppose the writer was considering 'natural evolution' or 'evolution considered apart from human activity' or something like that.
Invertebrates means they don't have a backbone. In general, any animal that's not a fish, amphibian, reptile, bird or mammal.
I remember those times, years ago.
in·ver·te·brate (
n-vûr
t
-br
t
)
adj.n.
- Lacking a backbone or spinal column; not vertebrate.
- Of or relating to invertebrates.
- An animal, such as an insect or a mollusk, that lacks a backbone or spinal column.
Source: The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary
Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Uh-huh. Yep. Right.
Yes. They prefer not to die. :)
ditto. In my BG (before gray) years.
This is speciation? What's the difference? This is how life was created? This is how wings evolved? This is how the spine evolved?
This is fantastic. Crickets are evolving into crickets.
Who paid for that 3.5 years....? LOL!
Adaptation is NOT evolution.
This is speciation? What's the difference? This is how life was created? This is how wings evolved? This is how the spine evolved?
Patience, grasshopper cricket, patience. 3.8 billion years is a long, long, long, long, long, ... time.
| Wow!... Imagine... If only man were as intelligent as these female crickets, maybe we could evolve ourselves some wings and strong legs too! |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.