Posted on 02/05/2005 11:37:51 AM PST by gobucks
We don't. Or do we? If so, how? Surely intelligence and design has little or nothing to do with it. Right?
That's pathological, I'd think. It is confusing emotionally driven flights of fancy with reality. Xenophobic.
Do you get out much "Doc"?
| Pegged it in one!
I'm not sure that he's ever posted blatantly out-of-context quotes from Darwin before, and even if he has, he's not been posting them nonstop despite explanations as to why their presentation is fundamentally dishonest.
Could well be. He seems a little better educated, but even dogs learn.
My own theory is that ALS is the BTK killer. They both live in Wichita; and every letter in ALS is one letter distant from a letter in BTK.
How long will you go on being simpleminded?That's exactly the question we have for you, chum.
We are witnessing, I think, a 'devolutionary' process here; man, well, some men, bent on their own limited view of the world, it's processes, and by extension, the underlying physics and chemistry, are attempting to deny wholesale even those things whuch have been developed during their own lifetimes: to wit, in this case, the evolutionary development of the computer (technology in general) and the pivotal role science (and the practical use of that science via engineering at al levels) has played.
"When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."- 1 Corinthians 13:11
I must say that I definately approve of your kind words. You may heap them on me at anytime you wish. As a matter of fact, perhaps a mutual admiration society is in order. You consistently demonstrate impeccable logic and present your points in a great way. :)
Whoever wrote this has been hitting the sauce too much.
There is a limit beyond which the error bounds exceed your initial (and projected) measurements.
I bet you intended that to be an intelligible sentence. Try it again. Keep it short and simple.
Non-predictive. It still didn't answer my proposal in post 352.
Before you accuse me of being a closet Creationist, I would inform you that Creationism is bunk. It is definitely due to insecure people trying to justify a mindset.
I am interested in science. If you want to accuse me as an epistemologist ( as they would at talk.origins ) and leave it at that, fine. I've been partaking in beer this evening and am rather grumpy.
But, wouldn't science be better served at understanding the mechanism, than pursuing grants?
Easy, guy. I'm agreeing with you. It's nasaman I'm referring to.
"BTK killer"??
Hard to believe I missed such a person, unless you mean ...
Projection of their inner feelings and desires onto others.
Sorry,reading your other posts you didn't seem the sort. But I get an itchy trigger finger on these threads. One might say I devolve.
I was merely giving you some examples of selective pressure leading to speciation. I assumed you'd see the 'predictability' inherent in my rather simplistic statements. Dog breeders (and more) and microbiologists alike are successfully predicting evolutionary outcome as a matter of day-to-day business.
Same city. What better job for a serial killer than a repairman who has to enter facilties at odd hours?
Thanks for the ping!
Short? Here's real curt, "Doc": You are a xenophobe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.