To: N3WBI3
Odly enough I am not allowed to post contracts with IBM to an internet post, something about confidentiality...
Fine. We've merely established that you can't point to a single public reference where IBM promises 5x9's of availability under Linux.
98 posted on
02/05/2005 10:07:04 PM PST by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
Fine. We've merely established that you can't point to a single public reference where IBM promises 5x9's of availability under Linux. Try this Google search: site:ibm.com linux "99.999" returns about 483 results.
As you alluded to earlier, the results are for IBM's mainframe-class machines. But the difference between 4x9 and 5x9 availability is less than one hour per year. 4x9 is still an acceptable rate for many mission-critical applications, considering the cost difference.
99 posted on
02/05/2005 11:05:59 PM PST by
HAL9000
(Skype me at "FreeRepublic")
To: Bush2000
And you (who made the initial assertion that linux cant get the same number of 9's) have provided nothing at all other than opinion.
103 posted on
02/06/2005 2:14:58 PM PST by
N3WBI3
To: Bush2000
you can't point to a single public reference where IBM promises 5x9's of availability under Linux. You can find one reference here.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson