Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Supreme Court: Some Provisional Ballots Violate N.C. Law
WRAL ^

Posted on 02/04/2005 9:00:57 PM PST by gfsiii

WRAL.com State Supreme Court: Some Provisional Ballots Violate N.C. Law

POSTED: 5:05 pm EST February 4, 2005 UPDATED: 6:31 pm EST February 4, 2005

RALEIGH, N.C. -- The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled Friday that provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct on election day cannot be lawfully counted, raising new questions about the state's Nov. 2 election results.

N.C. SUPREME COURT Read the ruling from the state Supreme Court.

The ruling was a victory for the Republican candidate for superintendent of public instruction, Bill Fletcher, who is locked in a tight battle with Democrat June Atkinson and who said that provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct should not be counted.

A Wake County court ruled against Fletcher, but the Supreme Court unanimously reversed that Friday and returned the case to that court.

Fletcher trails Atkinson in balloting from November's general election by 8,535 votes out of more than 3.3 million cast.

In the high court's opinion, Associate Justice George Wainwright said election officials should "work with voters to help them locate their correct precinct" rather than accept ballots cast at the wrong precinct.

"Indeed, when a voter appears at the wrong polling place, election officials have a statutory duty to assist the voter in finding the correct precinct in which to vote," Wainwright wrote. "In sum, North Carolina law does not permit out-of-precinct provisional ballots to be counted in state and local elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: provisionalballots; stealingelections; votefraud
Seems like we all knew they shouldn't count... aka Ohio, but the Dem N.C. election board had to be told again....

Will be interesting to see if it affects the race or not.

The wildcard is that there are still 4400 votes from the highly Rep. county that were lost ... so if the race gets inside of that margin ...

1 posted on 02/04/2005 9:00:57 PM PST by gfsiii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gfsiii

This has to do with state law. The fact that Ohio doesn't count provisionals in the wrong precinct has nothing to do with NC.

Note that I have no idea if the court is right about NC law.


2 posted on 02/04/2005 9:09:03 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane (http://drunkengop.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gfsiii
San Diego has a duly elected mayor not a bought and paid for union puppet because the handpicked Judge would not go along with the appeal-------finally
3 posted on 02/04/2005 9:09:56 PM PST by Foolsgold (dumped daschel he he he he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gfsiii
still 4400 votes from the highly Rep. county that were lost ...

there's a box on Hillary's desk in her office

4 posted on 02/04/2005 11:51:22 PM PST by maine-iac7 (...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson