Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia, China to Hold Security Talks
Newsmax ^ | January 2, 2005

Posted on 02/03/2005 7:31:48 PM PST by TapTheSource

Russia, China to Hold Security Talks

NewsMax.com Wires

Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2005

MOSCOW -- Russia and China will hold regular security consultations, President Vladimir Putin and a visiting Chinese official announced Wednesday, moving to further strengthen close military cooperation between the two Cold War-era adversaries.

China's State Councilor Tang Jiaxuan told Putin that Beijing does not have such a consultation mechanism with any other country. He called Russia China's "main partner for strategic cooperation." "This is the first time ever that China is establishing a mechanism of national security consultations with another country," said Tang, who said he had discussed details of the initiative with Russian Security Council secretary Igor Ivanov earlier in the day.

"We decided to establish such a mechanism with Russia because we have close positions regarding the international situation, key international and regional issues, as well as issues related to maintaining peace and helping global development," Tang said. "We have common strategic interests related to those issues."

Putin hailed an increasingly close cooperation between the former Communist rivals, saying that "relations in the political, economic and security sphere and in the field of military cooperation have been developing intensively."

Putin said that Moscow is looking forward to a visit by President Hu Jintao set for May and a joint Russian-Chinese military exercise set for later this year.

The maneuvers, set to begin in August, were seen by many observers as Russia's response to the cooling of relations with the United States and other Western nations, most recently over the presidential election in Ukraine.

Gen. Vladimir Mikhailov, Russia's air force chief, said last month that Tu-22M and Tu-95 bombers will take part in the exercises, hoping to encourage China's interest in buying them.

China's air force has some older Soviet-designed bombers, but they have far lower capability than the Tu-22Ms and Tu-95s, which are capable of hitting distant targets with long-haul conventional or nuclear-tipped cruise missiles.

After decades of rivalry, Moscow and Beijing have developed what they call a strategic partnership since the 1991 Soviet collapse, pledging their adherence to a "multipolar world," a term that refers to their opposition to a perceived U.S. domination in global affairs.

China has purchased billions of dollars worth of fighters, missiles, submarines and destroyers, becoming the No. 1 customer for struggling Russian defense industries.

2005 The Associated Press


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: chinaaxis; eusasiaalliance; military; redchina; russia; secutity; sovietunion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Boy does this language sound eerily familiar!!!

(From the article)

"He called Russia China's "main partner for strategic cooperation." "This is the first time ever that China is establishing a mechanism of national security consultations with another country," said Tang..."We decided to establish such a mechanism with Russia because we have close positions regarding the international situation, key international and regional issues, as well as issues related to maintaining peace and helping global development".

1 posted on 02/03/2005 7:31:48 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Optimist; weikel; anotherview; ...

Eurasian Alliance ping!!!


2 posted on 02/03/2005 7:32:50 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

They richly deserve one another. "Birds of feather..."


3 posted on 02/03/2005 7:35:01 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Thanks. We need to strengthen our military and alliance with both Japan, Taiwan, Australia, and South Korea (if that country is willing) to counter this. A free Iran, Iraq, and Afganistan would also be a mejor step in helping to contain this Eurasian Alliance.


4 posted on 02/03/2005 7:35:45 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Shoot first and ask questions later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

"We need to strengthen our military and alliance with both Japan, Taiwan, Australia, and South Korea (if that country is willing) to counter this."

This would be good. I would just add that we should cut off all aid and trade with this two countries. Why feed the dragon that plans to one day eat you?


5 posted on 02/03/2005 7:38:21 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

I agree. Cut off aid to Russia and withdraw the free trade with China.


6 posted on 02/03/2005 7:41:09 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Shoot first and ask questions later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

This must be the most cynical of all diplomacy because the Russians and the Chinese have hated each other for many centuries, and they don't trust each other for a minute now. They couldn't even get along when it was the Soviet Union and Red China, communist brother countries.:)


7 posted on 02/03/2005 7:52:54 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

We see arguments from the Russian propaganda contingent regarding Russia's economic needs. ...no problem with those arguments. It would be great to see Russia build trade relations with businesses in some of the more benevolent countries. And arranging trade with private enterprises around the world can take much time.

But we are concerned about Russia's military alliances and exchanges of war materiel.


8 posted on 02/03/2005 7:58:07 PM PST by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xJones
"They couldn't even get along when it was the Soviet Union and Red China, communist brother countries"

Actually, according to one KGB defector (Anatoliy Golitsyn) and the former CIA chief of Counterintelligence (James Jesus Angleton), the Soviet Union and Red China healed their split immediately after Stalin's death. According to them, the Soviets and the Red Chinese agreed to perpetuate the notion of a split in order to dupe the West into supporting one side against the other depending on which side was perceived to suit our interests. If this is true, it means that when we were supporting one side against the other (Sino vs. Soviet, Soviet vs. Sino), we were really supporting them both.
9 posted on 02/03/2005 8:09:11 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"It would be great to see Russia build trade relations with businesses in some of the more benevolent countries."

They can't because they are focused on nurturing and directing their traditional allies, which are traditional enemies of the West. Tells you a lot about "Russia." Even Red China, maker of all the slave-made goods we practically have no option but to buy anymore, is beginning to flex its muscle by openly siding with our enemies. In short, they are both working in concert against the MAIN ENEMY...namely, the US, the West(although Western Europe is so morally bankrupt they have no idea they are being boiled slowly like a frog). Sooner or later the Russians and the Red Chinese will no longer be able to conceal their true intentions...that's when all hell breaks loose.


10 posted on 02/03/2005 8:21:47 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; Happy2BMe; devolve; Jeff Head; risk
Eastasia has always been allied with Eurasia and at war with Oceania.
11 posted on 02/03/2005 8:41:58 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
Where is that Russian freeper Destro who is always sticking up for Putin? I need to see him explain to me again how Putin's actions are because he is a conservative and a friend of democracy. It looks like more of the same old game from the Russians, playing chess with world politics. We have enough problems without the Russians adding to them.
12 posted on 02/03/2005 8:51:12 PM PST by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
Yes, Oolitsyn, I've read about him. But there is not a "special relationship" between the Russians and the Chinese the way there is say, with the U.S. and Britain. The Russians don't trust 1.3 billion Chinese on the other side of their border, and the Chinese see a weak Russia.

The Russians are famously xenophobic, and now the Chinese have morphed into the new Mongol Horde. This will be a very antsy alliance to say the least, because it's like going to dinner with your worst neighbor and wondering if your food is being poisoned.

13 posted on 02/03/2005 8:52:20 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource
With each passing day, as we watch what transpires around us, it is more and more clear that the Red Chinese are planning for and preparing for war with us...just as they have said they would.

I wrote the DRAGON'S FURY SERIES to warn about just this possibility.

14 posted on 02/03/2005 9:15:59 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Yeah that crossed my mind for a story I was going to write at one time. I just did not have the time to write one novel much less a whole series though.


15 posted on 02/03/2005 9:28:19 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Shoot first and ask questions later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: koba37; dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Optimist; weikel; ...

PONDER THIS...

“ All warfare is based on deception. Therefore, when capable, feign incapacity; when active, inactivity. When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are near. Offer the enemy a bait to lure him; feign disorder and strike him. When he concentrates, prepare against him; where he is strong, avoid him. Anger his general and confuse him. Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance. Keep him under strain and wear him down. When he is united, divide him. Attack where he is unprepared; sally out when he does not expect you. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme skill… Disrupt his alliances…Therefore I say: “[If you] know the enemy and know yourself, in a hundred battles you will never be in peril. When you are ignorant of the enemy but know yourself, you chances of winning or losing are equal; if ignorant of both your enemy and yourself, you are certain in every battle to be in peril.”

SUN TZU, The Art of War, Oxford University Press Edition (also published in the Soviet Union in 1950, in Germany in 1957; also published by the East German Ministry of Defense and was prescribed for study in the East German military academies; it was published in China in 1957, 1958, and 1959, and Moa was known to be influenced by the book in his conduct of the civil war.)




“I don’t think Gorbachev is a Leninist anymore…I don’t think we have been deceived—at least, I hope we haven’t.”

MARGARET THATCHER, Personal interview with Christopher Story, former occasional advisor to M. Thatcher and editor of Anatoly Golitsyn’s second book, Perestroika Deception.




“Federation is a transitional form towards the complete union…of all nations”

Thesis on the National and Colonial Questions adopted by the Second Comintern Congress, July 28, 1920




“The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states, and all national isolation, not only to bring the nations closer to each other, but also to merge them…The merging of states is inevitable.”

V.I. Lenin, Imperialism and the Right to Self-determination, cited in a paper by the British Communist R. Palme Dutt, published in 1949 by International Publishers, New York.




“The right of self-determination, the stage of possible separation or alternatively federation is, Lenin insisted, only a prelude or transition to the ultimate aim of the merging of nations.”

R. Palme Dutt, British Communist, International Publishers, New York, 1949.




"An example…is what is happening in the Soviet Union. Separation must come before integration.”

The United Nations in the 1990s: A Second Chance?, Max Jakobson, Twentieth Century Fund [UN front group], 1993, page 123.




“The Soviet United States of Europe is the only correct slogan pointing the way out from European disunity, a disunity which threatens not only Germany but the whole of Europe with complete structural and cultural decline.”

Leon Trotsky, writing in his journal The Bulletin of the Opposition, Number 17-18, November-December 1930, page 53.




“[The aim is to] carry forward the ideas of the New World Order.”

Karl Marx, cited in Karl Marx and the United States, James E Jackson, International Publishers, New York, July 1983.




“The transition step to the New World Social Order involves merging the newly captive nations into regional governments.”

F. Petrenko and V. Popov, Soviet Foreign Policy, Objectives and Principles, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1985.




“The objective of Communist strategy is [to set up] the New World Social Order.”

William Z. Foster, Toward Soviet America, 1932




“We set ourselves the ultimate aim of destroying the state.”

V.I. Lenin, State and Revolution, International Publishers, New York, 1961 Edition, page 68.




“Our vision of the European space from the Atlantic to the Urals is not that of a closed system. Since it includes the Soviet Union [sic: he said this six month after the USSR had ‘ceased to exist’], which reaches to the shores of the Pacific, it goes beyond nominal geographical boundaries.”

Mikhail Gorbachev, Nobel Peace Prize Lecture, Oslo, June 1992.


16 posted on 02/03/2005 9:29:41 PM PST by TapTheSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TapTheSource

Most Americans swallow disinformation as readily as if it was their favorite Candy. Our government is almost as capable as Russia in feeding it to us.


17 posted on 02/03/2005 10:34:01 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; ALOHA RONNIE

I have one thing to remind us of - COSCO - ready and waiting!


18 posted on 02/04/2005 12:10:04 AM PST by AnimalLover ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

I'm so happy they want to get along. I mean think what it will do for global stability. [/sarcasm]


19 posted on 02/04/2005 12:22:53 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
COSCO figures heavily into my series.
20 posted on 02/04/2005 12:59:44 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson