Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ASTRONOMERS FIND PART OF UNIVERSE’S MISSING MATTER
Ohio State University ^ | 02 February 2005 | News Office Staff

Posted on 02/03/2005 7:40:50 AM PST by PatrickHenry

Found: 7 percent of the mass of the universe. Missing since: 10 billion years ago.

Consider one more astronomical mystery solved. Scientists have located a sizeable chunk of the universe that seemed to be missing since back when the stars first formed. It’s floating in super-hot rivers of gas, invisible to the naked eye, surrounding galaxies like our own.

And a completely different kind of mystery matter -- dark matter -- may have put it there.

The results appear in the current issue of the journal Nature.

To make this latest discovery, astronomers at Ohio State University and their colleagues used NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory to take the highest-quality spectrum of its type ever made.

Though astronomers had previously detected the rivers of gas with X-ray telescopes, this is the first time that the gas has been studied in enough detail to calculate how much of it is out there. The amount of gas matches the amount of material that went missing 10 billion years ago, said Smita Mathur [pic at original article], associate professor of astronomy at Ohio State.

She and doctoral student Rik Williams did this work with astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), the University of California, Berkeley, the Instituto de Astronomia in Mexico, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The lead author on the paper is Fabrizio Nicastro of CfA.

According to current theories, when the universe began, it contained a certain amount of normal matter, a cache of protons and neutrons that today make up all normal atoms -- “stuff” as we know it.

Astronomers can use optical telescopes to look back in time and see what happened to the normal atoms, called baryons. Around 10 billion years ago, when half of the baryons became stars and galaxies and lit up the sky, the other half just seemed to disappear.

This new study shows that the missing baryons are still out there, Mathur said, they’re just floating in gas that is too hot to see with an optical telescope.

The gas that surrounds our galaxy, for example, is 100 times hotter than the sun -- so hot that it shines in high-energy X-rays instead of lower-energy visible light.

In 2002, Mathur and her colleagues used Chandra’s X-ray telescope to gather the first evidence that the gas was made of baryons. The image they obtained was a spectrum, a measurement of the different wavelengths of X-rays emanating from the material. But to prove that there was enough material there to account for the all the missing baryons, they knew they needed to take a better spectrum with the telescope.

“Those first results were tantalizing, but not foolproof. The signal-to-noise ratio in the spectrum was just not good enough,” Mathur said.

They needed a bright light source to pump up the signal, one located on the other side of the gas as viewed from Earth, so that the light shined directly through the gas. They found their source in a quasar, located in the constellation Ursa Major -- the Big Dipper.

Astronomers believe that quasars are galaxies with very massive black holes in the center. The black holes in quasars don’t just suck material in, they also shoot material out in a high-speed jet. The jet glows brightly, and the result is an intense beam of light -- exactly what Mathur and her colleagues needed to take their picture.

The astronomers decided to use the light from Markarian 421, one of the brightest quasars known. On two days -- one in October 2002 and another in July 2003 -- when Markarian 421 was at its brightest and the beam of light was pointing right at Earth, Mathur’s team took two very high quality X-ray spectra of the intervening gas.

Judging by the high signal-to-noise ratio of the data, the astronomers believe that one of their images is the best X-ray spectrum ever taken.

That spectrum isn’t what most people would consider a pretty picture -- it’s really just a graph of energy levels of light that penetrated the gas -- but to Mathur it’s absolutely beautiful, because it proved definitively that there are enough baryons -- “normal” atoms -- out there to account for the missing mass.

“This is such a wonderful spectrum that there is just no doubt about it,” she said.

Once they had the new spectra, the astronomers were able to calculate the density of baryons in the gas, and confirmed that the amount of material matched the missing matter they were searching for.

As to how the missing baryons ended up where they are, Mathur suspects that they were drawn there by the gravity of a different kind of matter, known as dark matter. Astronomers know that some unseen material provides most of the gravity of the universe, though they disagree on what dark matter is actually made of.

If Mathur and her colleagues are right, then their finding supports a dramatic theory: that dark matter provides a kind of backbone to the universe, where the structure of normal matter like galaxies follows an underlying structure of dark matter.

This research was sponsored by NASA-Chandra grants and NASA’s Long-Term Space Astrophysics program.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: astronomy; cosmology; missingmass; turass; universe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
This looks like it's really significant.
1 posted on 02/03/2005 7:40:51 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

bttt


2 posted on 02/03/2005 7:41:49 AM PST by stainlessbanner (Don't mess with old guys wearing overhauls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Science Ping! An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped.

3 posted on 02/03/2005 7:41:52 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

They looked under my daughter's bed and there it was--along with a whole bunch of other crap.


4 posted on 02/03/2005 7:42:31 AM PST by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

ASTRONOMERS FIND PART OF UNIVERSE’S MISSING MATTER

Apparently, it was trapped between Hillary Clinton's thighs.


5 posted on 02/03/2005 7:42:32 AM PST by RockinRight (It's NOT too early to start talking about 2006...or 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I didn't take it.


6 posted on 02/03/2005 7:43:58 AM PST by cripplecreek (they call me tater.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

Thanks and very interesting!


7 posted on 02/03/2005 7:45:23 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

HAHAHAHAHA!!!

NIKOS


8 posted on 02/03/2005 7:47:21 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
If anything else is missing I bet it's in some womans purse. You can look and look in a womans purse and never find what you are after. But hand the darn thing to the owner and whatever you need gets pulled right out.

HUBBY: "Honey, I've been looking for the secret to the Universe in your purse but can't find it!"

WIFE (rolling eyes): "It was right there! Here you go!"

9 posted on 02/03/2005 7:47:31 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Denny Crane: "I look to two things: First to God and then to Fox News.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

The missing matter is THE variable as to whether the Universe is open or closed.


10 posted on 02/03/2005 7:49:09 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto

If it's anything like my daughter's bed, the universe's missing matter is largely composed of Barbie accessories and dust bunnies. Seems kind of anticlimactic.


11 posted on 02/03/2005 7:51:01 AM PST by general_re (How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The mass of the missing baryons in the X-ray forest of the warm–hot intergalactic medium

Recent cosmological measurements indicate that baryons comprise about four per cent of the total mass-energy density of the Universe, which is in accord with the predictions arising from studies of the production of the lightest elements. It is also in agreement with the actual number of baryons detected at early times (redshifts z > 2). Close to our own epoch (z < 2), however, the number of baryons detected add up to just over half ( 55 per cent) of the number seen at z > 2 (refs 6–11), meaning that about 45 per cent are 'missing'. Here we report a determination of the mass-density of a previously undetected population of baryons, in the warm–hot phase of the intergalactic medium. We show that this mass density is consistent, within the uncertainties, with the mass density of the missing baryons.

From First pp

12 posted on 02/03/2005 7:51:43 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

"The missing matter is THE variable as to whether the Universe is open or closed."
I drove by the universe late last night and the lights were off. I just assumed it was closed.


13 posted on 02/03/2005 7:52:17 AM PST by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Found: 7 percent of the mass of the universe.


14 posted on 02/03/2005 7:52:59 AM PST by thecabal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
An elite subset of the Evolution list.

Aka smarmy morons.

Give it a rest, Bishop.

15 posted on 02/03/2005 7:53:19 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
The missing matter is THE variable as to whether the Universe is open or closed.

I understand that estimates of how much matter exists, for the purpose of "closing" the universe, were simply done by taking the observed size (the volume determined by the Hubble radius) and observed estimates of the presence of matter (galaxies, etc.). But the so-called missing matter complicates such estimates. As does the recent observations that cosmic expansion is accelerating.

16 posted on 02/03/2005 7:53:59 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
...super-hot rivers of gas, invisible to the naked eye, surrounding galaxies like our own.

Does this mean we have to quit laughing at the ancients that believed in Aether (ether)?

17 posted on 02/03/2005 7:55:24 AM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I was expecting a picture of Michael Mooron


18 posted on 02/03/2005 7:56:36 AM PST by clamper1797 (VA-93 --- CVA-41 Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72-73)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The last bits in the article are a hack tower o spin. This does nothing to support exotic dark matter. It suggests that the amount of ordinary matter is what it was expected to be, in a relatively empty universe. All the "evidence" for exotic dark matter continues to rest on entirely dubious static galaxy gravity only models, aka people not haven't the slightest clue why galaxy rotation curves remain flat out to long distances. It is much more likely our theories of galactic evolution are simply wrong. It is less likely than that, but still much more likely than strange dark matter, that our theory of gravity is flawed on large scales (as we know it is at small ones).
19 posted on 02/03/2005 7:57:10 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Found: 7 percent of the mass of the universe. Missing since: 10 billion years ago.

Did it have my socks in it? The ones that weren't in the dryer when I took my stuff out?

20 posted on 02/03/2005 7:57:59 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson