Rachel Marsden: A Bad Week for Terrorists, Saddam, Liberals and G.I. Joe

rachelmarsden.com ^ | 2/2/5 | Rachel Marsden

[.cnI redruM]

We must get to the bottom of this!

[visualops]

And we definitely got all the sense of humor- because the Dims have none.

[WOSG]

Good Column on Iraq.

[Dr. Luv]

Isn't this woman a serial stalker? Accused of trying to ruin the lives of not one, but two innocent men? Methinks we better hold off the praise on this nutbar...

http://www.wtopnews.com/index.php?sid=299169&nid=380&template=print

[presidio9]

Marsden was charged with harassment after she persisted in telephoning and sending e-mails to Morgan, now 54, for almost a month after he ended their relationship.

Sounds like most of what you know about her past comes from a Google search. There are no websites defending Marsden on the Internet, because people went to court demanding that she not be allowed to write about them. The CBC, which did a documentary on "Right Wing Media" that featured Al Franken breaking down in tears while talking about the Iraq War rehashed the allegations against Marsden in the same piece. But there's a problem here: News in Canada is censored by the left. They don't HAVE guaranteed free speech. Making phone calls to a much older guy for a month after he dumps you is not "stalking," and we'll never know what happened with her swim coach, because she is not allowed to talk about it. Bill O'Rielly respects her enough to use her.

[Dead Dog]

Marsden was charged with harassment after she persisted in telephoning and sending e-mails to Morgan, now 54, for almost a month after he ended their relationship.

OOOOO Emails and Telephone calls. If you ask me Morgan is a Homo.

[Dr. Luv]

In fact I was in Vancouver when the whole sorry story of her accusing her swim coach of sexual harrasment to try and get him fired when it was Marsden who was harrassing him. Then years later more harrasment (CRIMINAL harrasment is what she was convicted of)of another innocent person.

This woman is a fruitcake - we do ourselves a disservice by defending her simply because she shares our views about politics.

[presidio9]

There are two sides to every story. Why are her accusers so afraid that she might tell hers?

[AnnaZ]

This woman is a fruitcake - we do ourselves a disservice by defending her simply because she shares our views about politics.

Hopefully the disservice is being done by her defenders, and not by you. Right? (Especially since I can't imagine any even-slightly-to-the-right person getting a fair shake by the Canadian media.)

[Dr. Luv]

In fact, when these stories came to light, she had yet to become Rachel Marsden public person. She was just another fruitcake wrongly accussing innocent men of harrasment - when it tuned out she was the harrasser.