Thank God the Clintons never did that.
Posted on 02/02/2005 6:43:13 AM PST by Pikamax
White House-friendly reporter under scrutiny By Charlie Savage and Alan Wirzbicki, Globe Staff and Globe Correspondent | February 2, 2005
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration has provided White House media credentials to a man who has virtually no journalistic background, asks softball questions to the president and his spokesman in the midst of contentious news conferences, and routinely reprints long passages verbatim from official press releases as original news articles on his website.
Jeff Gannon calls himself the White House correspondent for TalonNews.com, a website that says it is "committed to delivering accurate, unbiased news coverage to our readers." It is operated by a Texas-based Republican Party delegate and political activist who also runs GOPUSA.com, a website that touts itself as "bringing the conservative message to America."
Called on last week by President Bush at a press conference, Gannon attacked Democratic Senate leaders and called them "divorced from reality." During the presidential campaign, when called on by Press Secretary Scott McClellan, Gannon linked Senator John F. Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, to Jane Fonda and questioned why anyone would dispute Bush's National Guard service.
Now, the question of how Gannon gets into White House press conferences is coming under intense scrutiny from critics who contend that Gannon is not a journalist but rather a White House tool to soften media coverage of Bush. The issue was raised by a media watchdog group and picked up by Internet bloggers, who linked Gannon's presence in White House briefings to recent controversies over whether the administration manipulates the flow of information to the public.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
They must have really did some digging to find a white house friendly reporter.
Thank God the Clintons never did that.
In other words, "real" journalists are upset because the White House doesn't approve only raving leftwing lying freaks.
In other words, the man was doing his job.
Dirty Democrat got this published, again?
Ranks right up there with the escapades of John dean.
Wow! It would really be a shame if the White House didn't let the press conferences consist entirely of unbiased, fair reporters, like Helen Thomas!
Pretty much sums up the entire MSM under the Klinton admin, no?
As opposed to the reporters that asked Bill Clinton questions...
As that hardball journalist Dan Rather said 'Bill Clinton is basically honest' or 'if I could be half as good as you and Hillary my life would be considered a success.'
Bush gets one 'soft' reporter and the Democrats get the rest.
Of course the Globe would have no problem with Massive Michael Moore globbing up the front row would they? I mean, he's objective right?
As we all know it's the job of the MSM, not the White House, to manipulate the flow of information to the public.
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Well, he has repeatedly commited the act of asking push-from-right questions. That would immediately make him suspect in a sea of the standard push-from-left questioners. After all, when 5 journos ask the president to admit he is wrong, and then one comes along and asks if a Dem senator might be wrong....well, it's just more than the presscorp can handle.
Good heavens. THIS is news. Helen Thomas' bilious, acidic, hamfisted domineering wasn't news; the others' advocacy journalism isn't news; reflections on the fact that ONE REPORTER's non-hostile questioning so stands out against the out-of-touch majority's tendentiousness isn't news — but this is news.
The MSM cannot possibly die quickly and horribly enough to satisfy me.
Dan
I guarantee you this one is going to blow up....even if it is arson on the part of the msm. Keep a sharp eye out....
Gee, the guy prints what was really said instead of taking it out of context and twisting the true meaning. Can't let that kind of honesty loose in the MSM...
Like someone said in an earlier post.. like the MSM ask John sKerry hard questions during the election </sarcasim>.
Sounds like they only want hard-core left wing journalist asking questions.
So who died and made the Boston Glob the final arbiter of who gets into White House Press conferences? Bitter, spiteful folks at the Glob, it seems to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.