To: Pikamax
In other words, "real" journalists are upset because the White House doesn't approve only raving leftwing lying freaks.
4 posted on
02/02/2005 6:45:40 AM PST by
Trippin
To: Trippin
Of course the Globe would have no problem with Massive Michael Moore globbing up the front row would they? I mean, he's objective right?
11 posted on
02/02/2005 6:47:56 AM PST by
JesseJane
(KERRY: I have had conversations with leaders, yes, recently.That's not your business, it's mine.)
To: Trippin; Dataman
In other words, "real" journalists are upset because the White House doesn't approve only raving leftwing lying freaks. Well-put.
It reminds me of the evolution/anything-else controversy. We're told that all scientists believe in evolution. Later, we learn that this is because anyone who doesn't believe in evolution is eo ipso disqualified from being a scientist.
Neat little circle.
Dan
21 posted on
02/02/2005 6:51:47 AM PST by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Trippin
Trippin said: "In other words, "real" journalists are upset because the White House doesn't approve only raving leftwing lying freaks."
No, it wasn't a real journalist, in this case, it was Democratic shill David Brock.
23 posted on
02/02/2005 6:52:07 AM PST by
bd476
(God Bless those in harm's way and bring peace to those who have lost loved ones today.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson