Posted on 02/01/2005 9:36:59 AM PST by jmc1969
The United Iraqi Alliance scored a sweeping victory. We know that the majority of those who voted cast their vote for the alliance," Abdul Aziz al-Hakim said. Hakim tops the candidate list of the Alliance, drawn up with the blessing of revered Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.
He also leads the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, one of the main parties in the powerful Alliance.
Iraq's 60 per cent Shiite majority thronged to the polls on Sunday, but many of the Sunni minority, which dominated Iraq under deposed dictator Saddam Hussein, stayed away.
Hakim said it was too soon to speculate who the next prime minister would be. The incumbent, Iyad Allawi, a secular Shiite, is seen as a leading candidate, along with Finance Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, a member of Hakim's party.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailytelegraph.news.com.au ...
Shiite's happening.
Dear Disgruntled former Bathists: Glad we could teach you Down-Syndrome-killing cowards how democracy operates. Feel free to join our powerless Democrats on the ash-heap of history. Fewer votes=less power. Congratulations.
At some point, some Iraqi representative mentioned that the Kurds are mostly Sunnis. Maybe it would be more correct to refer to the Mad, Bad, Sunnis as simply Saddam Loyalists.
I suppose the Christians of Iraq are also about to learn how democracy works. Good luck to them. I hope they survive.
Is this good or bad?
Shite-eating grin?
Did we have the proper oversight to ensure that all Iraqi candidates followed proper campaign finance reform rules? Did we have enough election monitors to keep people from passing out campaign literature within 100 feet of polling places? Did we make sure that voters weren't contributing more than the government-approved amount to their respective political parties? Did we see to it that the televised debates excluded all opposing viewpoints except for those of the two major party candidates?
If we're going to show these people how "democracy" operates, then let's make sure they get it right.
He also leads the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq..
Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq
Sounds a little ominous to me.
Hope the Shiites aren't playing a game of letting us take care of the Sunni 'insurgency', expending our blood and treasure, so that when we leave they'll have a free hand to establish their Islamic Revolution in Iraq
Oh, perish the thought. It's not like Muslim leaders lie or anything. But you could go here to see some of Sistani's beliefs and rulings.
http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/p.php?p=Ahkam&url=Q%26A
I especially like this one:
Q.62) A doctor who works in a hospital in Chicago, USA might, as a matter of standing procedure, not resort to giving a patient, who is suffering from terminal illness, life saving help like CPR. This procedure is adopted when, for instance, the patient's heart had stopped or blood pressure are dropping. In so doing the hospital and doctors will let the patient pass away peacefully. Should the doctor recommend DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) following hospital orders?
If the patient is non-Muslim, there is no objection to not giving the him life saving help like CPR. If the patient is Muslim, you have to exhaust all means to rescuing his life. The patient's request and/or that of his relatives not to save his life must be rendered ineffective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.