So, does this mean gays become pro-life, when parents start testing for this gene and aborting gay babies?
another link
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4215427.stm
I'd like to welcome the homosexual lobby to the pro-life side.
TS
INTREP
When men have sex with other men in prison is this due to the "gay gene"? And when they get out and resume sex with women this is due to what?
I believe that most if not all homosexual men have those tendencies mostly due to experience, that is molestation. The younger the child is molested (of course typically it is a male doing the molesting) the more likely the child will have these tendencies. Children older than 13 or more are less likely.
Two gay men I knew in college were both molested as children, one by an uncle the other by someone who was suppose to protect him. The guy molested by his uncle specifically brought up that incident to me. I said ".. but boys don't have sexual feelings" and he replied "..you don't know you just don't know."
Other things I've heard have backed this up, such as a news story about a neighbor who molested many of the young boys in the neighbor. The man was arrested but the pain didn't end there. Later, two of the young boys who were molested were caught giving each other oral sex in a tub by their parents. You can't tell me they would have been doing this if they hadn't been molested.
Further, I'd also heard that almost all if not all child molesters were victims of molestation themselves. This is not to say that all children who are molested become molesters themselves. However, once again a learned behavior.
The fact is that if someone’s first sexual experience is as a child with someone of the same sex then that person is very likely to identify sexual feelings with people of the same sex. These sexual feelings would feel natural for them because their experience is at such an early age.
Protect your kids.
I don't think so. Many gene mutations cause many disordered conditions...
Regardless, if homosexual gene abnormalities are verified as causal in some cases -I do not believe homosexuals will ever stop trying to get society to accept homosexuality and accept homosexual activity as 'normal' rather than what the activity is -intrinsically disordered and depraved.
There may be an explanation other than genetic or childhood experiences and environment. Hormonal anomalies in the womb may be a factor.
1. Girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The girls are masculinized by they androgens produced by the overactive adrenal glands. They have a higher than normal incidence of lesbianism.
2. DES (diethyl stilbestrol) daughters. In addition to the propensity for developing cervical cancer, these girls are much more likely to be lesbian than the general population.
3. Likewise DES sons are more likely to have disturbances in their sexual and gender identity development.
4. Other drugs, such as barbiturates or dilantin, that may affect the development of the hypothalamus and brain structure have been implicated as increasing the incidence of homosexuality or increasing the likelihood of gender identity problems.
Ya, queers wear Jordashe jeans
“Since sexual orientation is such a complex trait, we’re never going to find any one gene that determines whether someone is gay or not,” says Mustanski. “It’s going to be a combination of various genes acting together as well as possibly interacting with environmental influences.”
| Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
|
|
| What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda |
|
|
| Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues" |
Soooooo... a biological reporoductive malfunction is hereditary, eh?
Riiiiight!
What a bunch of BS. If it is a genetic disorder that leads to NON-PROCREATION then our liberal friends, who like to hijack science in order to justify all their nutty ideas, should know that this genetic disorder will disappear because of natural selection.
No, it won't.
Just heard Neal Boortz for a little bit today and I know why I don't listen to him on a regular basis. He had a person named Paul briefly make a few comments about this study before he cut Paul off and launched into this whiny tirade (supposedly speaking for "Paul" now), about "Don't read anything that doesn't allow me to hate! Them gays chose to be that way...," blah, blah, blah, with a southern accent and all.
He apparently read off that so-called "study" and I guess he buys it, lock, stock and barrel. There are times when Neal sounds like a libertarian but on this issue, he sounds like a straight-up LIBERAL (libertine!)! You know, anyone who doesn't tow the homo-promo line is full of hate and you must be an unenlightened country bumpkin to believe homosexuals choose their sexual "orientation".
And Lesbians?? Where are they in this report?
Or was the data there even less conclusive?
Suggest? Several? May?
Doesn't exactly sound conclusive to me.
Except maybe Michael Jackson....who was a black man who turned into a white woman.
If our actions are bound only by the wants of the flesh then society will not hold. Biology is not a moral code.