1 posted on
01/26/2005 3:57:59 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Sure hope this catches on
2 posted on
01/26/2005 4:01:05 AM PST by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
To: kattracks
Let us not rest until Arizona's voter laws are the law of the land.
3 posted on
01/26/2005 4:02:55 AM PST by
PhilipFreneau
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. -- Psalms 14: 1, 53:1)
To: kattracks
Now we need to purge the voter rolls so that EVERYBODY needs to register.
[I wonder if dead people are still citizens?] Actually, while Governor Napolitano fights this measure, as a good Democrat, I don't have the sense that there is widespread organized fraud. My perception is from Phoenix. Tucson may be different.
To: kattracks
Any takers on when a judge will overturn this?
6 posted on
01/26/2005 4:16:14 AM PST by
Wormwood
(Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
To: kattracks
They argued the changes will erect barriers that will hinder minorities' participation in elections and hamper grassroots voter registration drives. Yes, it will hamper the registration of illegal voters.
8 posted on
01/26/2005 4:18:24 AM PST by
Go Gordon
(If at first you don't succeed...skydiving is not for you.)
To: kattracks
"Arizona requires proof of citizenship to vote"THIS IS NOT PC! - congrats AZ.
9 posted on
01/26/2005 4:53:30 AM PST by
patriot_wes
(When I see two guys kissin..argh! Is puking a hate crime yet?)
To: kattracks
the people who don't vote legally will just forge documents.
To: kattracks
photo ID should be required in every state to vote, and one day it will be.
12 posted on
01/26/2005 5:21:00 AM PST by
The Wizard
(DemonRATS: enemies of America)
To: kattracks
We need this nation wide.The way it has been is a joke to honest voters.
14 posted on
01/26/2005 5:24:02 AM PST by
solo gringo
(Liberal democrats are parasites)
To: kattracks
A civil-rights group and Democratic legislators recently had urged the Department of Justice to reject the law. They argued the changes will erect barriers that will hinder minorities' participation in elections and hamper grassroots voter registration drives.This came right out of Argumentation for Dummies.
The law also erect barriers to the careless and the indifferent, (and, minor point, the fraudulent) who "lose" their documentation. Tough noogies.
Imagine using that excuse to argue that I can't prove I paid 2001 Federal taxes because I "lost" my tax return.
19 posted on
01/26/2005 6:11:34 AM PST by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
To: kattracks
What I'm hoping for now is a letter in the mail telling me that I have to re-register to vote. That way we can be sure that every voter on the rolls is really a citizen, or really alive, as the case may be.
21 posted on
01/26/2005 6:26:19 AM PST by
ex 98C MI Dude
(Proud Member of the Reagan Republicans)
To: kattracks
Just for fun, here is the
DU Thread on the matter.
26 posted on
01/26/2005 7:49:14 AM PST by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4.1O dana super trac pak; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...
To: kattracks
Just wait for the first person to use a mexican ID card in order to vote in a US election.
2006 is going to have all states with central databases rather than county by county databases.
Why is it not the law in all states to provide photoID to vote? Many states have had this for DECADES.
To: kattracks
Excellent idea. In fact it should have been a given in every state for the last 200 years.
37 posted on
01/27/2005 12:10:27 AM PST by
Dustbunny
(The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson