Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush NG story

Posted on 01/25/2005 8:03:14 AM PST by weezel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2005 8:03:14 AM PST by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: weezel

Next time, use the word VANITY in the headline.


2 posted on 01/25/2005 8:05:57 AM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel

President Bush was not an "Airman."


3 posted on 01/25/2005 8:06:44 AM PST by Horatio Gates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel

Come on Dan, the story's dead thanks to you and your flunkies. Just log in using your real name and we'll give you the sympathy you deserve.


4 posted on 01/25/2005 8:06:51 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel

You're still interested in this story? I'd say, "Give it a rest."


5 posted on 01/25/2005 8:08:02 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel

No cares anymore. That was 2004. The election is over. Now Bush is trying to massacre old people by allowing people to invest some of their own Social Security money.


6 posted on 01/25/2005 8:08:53 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel

Still going after 'fake but accurate' are they? Idiots.


7 posted on 01/25/2005 8:10:27 AM PST by JesseJane (KERRY: I have had conversations with leaders, yes, recently.That's not your business, it's mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Next time, kiss my a/ss.


8 posted on 01/25/2005 8:22:40 AM PST by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weezel

Irrelevant at this point in time.

Also, he was not an Airman (enlisted), bt an LT (Officer)

Do some more research before posting silly vanity questions here.


9 posted on 01/25/2005 8:25:00 AM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel
Excuse me, but consider a congressman's son, CIA director's spawn and the priviledge that comes with that? So what? That's how the world turns.

Does anyone claim that Chelsea Clinton didn't get special favors in her employment searches? Not too many bachelor degree's pull down over a million a year in their first gigs out of college........

I'll take the special treatment of a pilot anyday over a congresswoman's kids vandalizing Avis rental cars while dressed up as mission impossible charicters or the surgeon general's son dealing cocaine.....Or how about Geraldine Ferraro's son caught dealing cocaine? Or Wanda Backus......and an endless list of social misfits spawned by politicians?

Nope, favoritism is a way of life in Washington and getting a few months AWOL in order to work on congressional campaigns or even detox sure beats the crowd doing the griping today.

10 posted on 01/25/2005 8:27:28 AM PST by blackdog (Demorat Politician = Those in power who manipulate tribal hatreds for personal gain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotokan
President Bush was not an "Airman."

Flyboy.

11 posted on 01/25/2005 8:27:29 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weezel
NO ONE CARES. It was a dead story from the get go. We had 4 yrs. to see what a really GREAT COMMANDER & CHIEF PRESIDENT BUSH IS. It would have NEVER GOTTEN any traction even if the docs were have been authentic of course we know they were forged. Besides how many men stepped forward and said it was total bullsh*t.
12 posted on 01/25/2005 8:28:37 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shield

Yes, someone does care. I have a liberal on another forum who insists that even tho the docs were forgeries, the contents were true. He says the secretary verified them , based on what the C.O. had said. I read an article where she said that Bush was never mentioned by the C.O. I am just asking if anyone has a link to it. All these smarta/sses on here need to either help, or shut the hell up.


13 posted on 01/25/2005 8:39:21 AM PST by weezel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: weezel

Tell the liberal to shut the hell up, not fellow Freepers.


14 posted on 01/25/2005 8:41:57 AM PST by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I hope that was meant with sarcasm, as I am one of those who can't wait to invest some of my SS!.... Just checking


15 posted on 01/25/2005 8:45:17 AM PST by N8VTXNinWV (Native Texan in WV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weezel

"I am just asking if anyone has a link to it. All these smarta/sses on here need to either help, or shut the hell up."

You're cruisin' for a ZOTIN' with that kinda' commentary.


16 posted on 01/25/2005 8:46:04 AM PST by roaddog727 (The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: weezel
Yes, someone does care. I have a liberal on another forum who insists that even tho the docs were forgeries, the contents were true

I have some magic beans for sale..he will love them

17 posted on 01/25/2005 8:48:13 AM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: weezel

Did you try search?


18 posted on 01/25/2005 8:49:26 AM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weezel

What a joke. NO ONE CARES!!!


19 posted on 01/25/2005 8:52:29 AM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: weezel

20 posted on 01/25/2005 9:10:02 AM PST by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson