Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oscar Nominations announced
www.oscar.com ^ | 1/25/05

Posted on 01/25/2005 5:53:22 AM PST by Borges

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461-474 next last
To: sartorius

Vera Drake was not por abort. Have you seen it? It was praised by conservative critic James Bowman and Vatican Radio.


81 posted on 01/25/2005 6:40:10 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
that 12th General Order I keep forgettin'

Push up position - ready begin ...

82 posted on 01/25/2005 6:40:42 AM PST by oh8eleven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Mary Mapes was a highly regraded, multi award winning producer of news. 'Nuf said.
83 posted on 01/25/2005 6:40:50 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Just say no to the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

I agree on 'The English Patient.' I actually enjoyed Gump the first time I saw it, but it suffers badly on repeated viewings.


84 posted on 01/25/2005 6:40:50 AM PST by Sloth (Al Franken is a racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: sartorius

That's great cinematagraphy and make up!


85 posted on 01/25/2005 6:41:03 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Borges

SIL was a bit of a fluff piece. But it was very well done, the sets, the language, the bit of romance.

And considering how dark many of the films have been lately, I found it refreshing.


86 posted on 01/25/2005 6:41:44 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: djf

Shakespeare's comedies were fluff. At least they would have been regarded that way in their day. Fluff can be exhilarating.


87 posted on 01/25/2005 6:42:34 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

It could've been nominated in the Best Foreign Film category. The fact that it wasn't speaks volumes.


88 posted on 01/25/2005 6:42:39 AM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Thing about TEP is I went in to watching it expecting to love it; a sprawling story set in WWII, etc.

Over the years the embarassment that Gump won is likely going to grow; 50 years from now it will be "what were they THINKING?!?!?" deals.


89 posted on 01/25/2005 6:43:06 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

It couldn't. American films are ineligible for that category.


90 posted on 01/25/2005 6:43:21 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: crazy man michael

I want to see Million Dollar Baby. Something about it appeals to me. Ray was an excellent movie. Foxx's portrayal of Ray Charles was amazing, IMO.


91 posted on 01/25/2005 6:44:03 AM PST by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I thought the only qualification was that the movie be in a foreign langauge?


92 posted on 01/25/2005 6:44:04 AM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

To: mewzilla
I thought the only qualification was that the movie be in a foreign langauge?

The rules for that category are insanely complicated. There were many other foreign language films that were ineligible this year. The Academy is going to revise the rules.

94 posted on 01/25/2005 6:45:19 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Nope. The country in question has to submit the film. It's to avoid problems for artists in places like China where getting nominated against their will can be dangerous for them. The goverments of other countries have to submit one film. The U.S. obviously does not submit its own film in that category.


95 posted on 01/25/2005 6:45:39 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Borges
It was recognized by Hollywood and it follows the same template as the "Cider House Rules". Vera is an abortionist even though she doesn't accept money and is as saintly as Michael Caine was portrayed.
96 posted on 01/25/2005 6:46:08 AM PST by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: Arpege92; Pharlap
As with anything the leftists and anarchists participate in .. it is do as I say, not as I do.
98 posted on 01/25/2005 6:46:31 AM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Just say no to the ACLU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher

"Duh! Because many people in Hollywood, especially many Jewish voters in the Academy, think the film is anti-Semetic."

Duh...I did not know that. Duh.
/sarcasm


99 posted on 01/25/2005 6:46:34 AM PST by PilloryHillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Diva Betsy Ross

Agreed. Not many of those I would waste my time on. Probably not many (any) my whole family could watch. I balk at giving my money to so many of these air headed types. Passion of the Christ should have been one of the nominees for best picture. They speak a different language.


100 posted on 01/25/2005 6:46:38 AM PST by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 461-474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson