Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Witches Kill Baby (40 puncture wounds & snapped neck)
Christian Underground ^ | Jan. 20, 2005

Posted on 01/23/2005 8:58:36 AM PST by Lindykim

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-262 next last
To: Happygal

First of all, if you are going to do it, it's your responsibility as a parent to make sure that instrument being used is sterile. I would check for myself, so why wouldn't I check for my child??

And who are you to say that it's vanity? A lot of people have it done for cultural reasons that have nothing to do with vanity. What are you going to do, question everyone's motives for doing so before "allowing" it?

You are free to not do it, and I am free to do so. I also must accept the consequences if something should go wrong.


181 posted on 01/25/2005 8:29:03 AM PST by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
I've been "dabbling" for around 15 years now. Still no demons.

You are more like your screen name than you know. What do you see when you look in a mirror?

"I am no devil, for this is none..."

uh huh.

Not that I'm judging you or anything...

182 posted on 01/25/2005 8:29:05 AM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: The SISU kid

Yeah, I saw that after I posted...lol. GTMA!


183 posted on 01/25/2005 8:29:40 AM PST by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick

I don't think parents should be allowed punch holes in their kids bodies, no.

And a child who gets Hep. B from a piercing gun has been endangered.


184 posted on 01/25/2005 8:29:54 AM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

Well, that's your opinion, and thankfully, not the law.

What if your eight year old, or even seventeen year old, wanted to get it done, and you said ok, and she still got Hep. B? You consented, you're still responsible, aren't you? They are still minors.

BTW, there is such a thing as a Hep. B vaccine. I have gotten it, and so have my children, thanks to overseas deployments.


185 posted on 01/25/2005 8:33:44 AM PST by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
"Don't Homer Simpson and his family live in Springfield?"

Yes they do....not too far from the volcanic Mt. Springfield.

In the center of town, of course, is the statue of the town's glorious founder: Jebediah Springfield.

186 posted on 01/25/2005 8:38:48 AM PST by chs68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: chs68

Thank you.


187 posted on 01/25/2005 8:41:14 AM PST by ladylib ("Marc Tucker Letter to Hillary Clinton" says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
When is circumcision recommended?

Circumcision may be indicated for certain medical reasons: vesicoureteral reflux, kidney or bladder infections, posthitis (inflammation of the foreskin), or true phimosis (narrowing of the foreskin). Parents for family, cultural, or religious reasons may request circumcision. Although circumcision is often done shortly after birth, the procedure may be delayed for certain reasons:

* the newborn infant may be too ill, in which case an elective circumcision when the infant is well can be arranged
* the infant may have an abnormality of the penis such as hypospadias or chordee, in which case the foreskin should be left in place for use in later reconstructive surgery


Just a little info.....
188 posted on 01/25/2005 8:41:38 AM PST by Ginifer (Just because you have one doesn't mean you have to act like one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
We may outlow, and have outlawed, certain practises that religions may employ. For example, plural marriage was once part of the Mormon religion. It is not any longer, and is illegal. Yet we have not outlawed the LDS church.

Not entirely correct. The state government of Missouri issued an extermination order against all Mormons, and drove them from the state by mob rule and murder, stole individual and church property, and generally behaved like the thugs and murderers they were.

That practice, reaching a new height (or depth), in Missouri was continued in Illinois until the Mormons were driven out of the territories of the United States altogether. "Utah" was owned by Mexico at the time. It seems abundantly clear that America ceased to be a land of freedom of religion in the mid 1800's.

Since we have the precedent of the might of the U.S. government being used against the Mormons, even to the extend of sending an army to "watch" over them, and punish them for any perceived abuses of the so-called National Morality, usually by men and women of low/no morality as defined even by that same rule. Why don't we see similar practices to quash the practices of other religions like psycedelic drugs used by "Native" American Indian "Religions", when anyone else using it is arrested? Why are envirowackos allowed to press for the forced implementation of their patently religious beliefs upon the rest of us under the guise of wilderness/clean air/clean water/global warming ruses? Clearly all "Religions" are not equal in America.

Why can't we send an army to surround and observe militant islam? Why can't we confiscate mosques where imams preach anti-US hatred and call for jihad/violence against America. The U.S government confiscated LDS Church properties for the mere practice of a biblical marriage philosophy which hurt no one.

I will tell you why, it is because the U.S government has become the defacto state religion, and it must crush any religion that is not evil like itself.

189 posted on 01/25/2005 8:50:56 AM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer

I don't have a problem at all with circumcision for medical purposes. :-)


190 posted on 01/25/2005 8:50:59 AM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

"I don't have a problem at all with circumcision for medical purposes. :-)"

Don't think you should have a problem even if it isn't for medical purposes... Freedom of choice. You decide what is right for you and others decide for themselves what is right for them. Live and let live!


191 posted on 01/25/2005 8:54:14 AM PST by Ginifer (Just because you have one doesn't mean you have to act like one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
I don't have a problem at all with circumcision for medical purposes.

But this "medical procedure" (mutilation) started out as a cultural & religious practice...

192 posted on 01/25/2005 8:55:40 AM PST by The SISU kid (The most effective changes are often the most difficult to make)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer

Like female circumcision?

Immigrant Nigerians are taking a fancy to doing that over here in Ireland to young girls. Cutting their clitoris, so they'll not take pleasure from sex. Some say it's religious or cultural...live and let live.

Others see it as barbarism. I'm with the second lot.


193 posted on 01/25/2005 8:57:55 AM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"I've been 'dabbling' for around 15 years now. Still no demons."

"Dabbling"?

How so?

If you're calling the 'Dark Side' out, it'll come -- but how will it manifest itself?

194 posted on 01/25/2005 8:59:58 AM PST by Liberator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Happygal

"Like female circumcision? "

Who was talking about that...IMHO you are like a dog with a bone...just can't let it go....

When one of your comments gets knocked down, you find another subject to entice and provoke...

Time to move on....


195 posted on 01/25/2005 9:02:29 AM PST by Ginifer (Just because you have one doesn't mean you have to act like one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Others see it as barbarism. I'm with the second lot.

Total Hypocracy!!

Let's say in the future some "mental health officials" determine cutting on the clitoris so they'll not take pleasure from sex to be "mentally beneficial". I know it's a stretch, but just hypothetically....??

196 posted on 01/25/2005 9:04:23 AM PST by The SISU kid (Just because I have one doesn't give you permission to mutilate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer

I'm changing the subject?

I'm comparing like with like. Mutilation of young bodies unnecessarily.


197 posted on 01/25/2005 9:05:27 AM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Ginifer
When one of your comments gets knocked down, you find another subject to entice and provoke... Time to move on....

I'm with you on that Gin'...

8^)

198 posted on 01/25/2005 9:06:12 AM PST by The SISU kid (Just because I have one doesn't give you permission to mutilate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: The SISU kid

You are talking about a hypothetical situation. I don't know if there are medical circumstances in which clitoral removal is required...there probably is. I'd like to know the premise on which it is reccommended.

There are medical reasons - other than cultural ones - why boys are circumcized. A cousin of mine was because of repeat urinary tract infections as a child. He's an Irish Catholic kid - no religious or cultural reason to have it done.


199 posted on 01/25/2005 9:09:20 AM PST by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Lindykim

BTTT


200 posted on 01/25/2005 9:10:07 AM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-262 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson