And you would STILL be wrong. Look, we have been utilizing hydrogen successfully ALREADY on an industrial scale for over a century, and the number of "bad incidents" is miniscule, in spite of all these so-called problems. The worst one mentioned is always the Hindenburg, but if you actually check into what happened, most of the damage was done by the burning diesel fuel and dope-and-aluminum impregated cloth skin of the Zeppelin, not the burning hydrogen.
I don't have time to go through a point-by-point rebuttal, but basically you are wrong on every point. We ALREADY do all the things you are saying can't be done. Measuring compressed gases is something that is done every day by hundreds of companies at thousands of locations. How do you think Air Products sells its compressed nitrogen, oxygen, CO2, and compressed gas mixtures??? These are sold both by tankage lots AND via pipeline. Hydrogen is in no way different from these already-handled products (and in fact "is" one of those products).
The ONLY thing we don't currently (no pun intended) know how to do is separate the hydrogen from its water carrier sufficiently economically. And in fact, if the recent announcement of 30% efficient nano-structured polymeric solar cells turns out to be real and practical, even THAT one may have already been solved.
I didn't say any of it was impossible - just likely to be impractical or uneconomical without new developments of one kind or another. I AM certain of a few things I stated - it will never be a practical replacement for natural gas, for instance. Electricity is a better choice for that. Which immediately reduces the exposure to gas leaks, because it eliminates the residential distribution system where most leakage occurs.
Filling a vehicle tank with a measured amount of H2 gas is a tricky - and energy intensive - business. You mentioned the way gases are sold today, and I think that might be the only practical method for H2. Specifically, vehicle tank exchange. It eliminates the problems of measurement and compression at the filling station.
Your point-to-point pipeline examples are not really a distribution system, because they do not address the number of destinations and the volume required for the application.
But a full unpressurized 20-gallon tank of ordinary gasoline contains about 120 pounds of gasoline, containing 19 pounds (8700 grams) of hydrogen. Not pressurized, the same tank would hold about 6.5 grams (1/4 ounce) of H2. How much pressure to match the same hydrogen density? Oxygen tanks are filled to 2200-2400 PSIG, or 150 to 160 atmospheres. Let's approximately double that - risky with exchangeable tanks - to 300 atm. 300 x 6.5 = 1950 g. or about 4 1/2 pounds. Oops. And how much does the tank weigh to hold that pressure? Maybe we need a better way to store H2.
Actually, I think that really clean gasoline - synthesized isooctane - might just be the fuel of the future. Diesel is too complex to synthesize economically. But octane, that can fuel both combustion engines and solid-oxide fuel cells (that oxidize the carbon to break the hydrogen free, then use the hydrogen to make electricity) is probably the transportation fuel of the future - and when we run out, we will just make more.
But please considerwhat I said before, about running most of our transportation from the electric grid. Today, 2/3 of our oil consumption is for transportation fuel, and over 95% of our transportation fuel comes from oil. Some is aviation fuel, but if we derived 90% of our ground transportation from the grid instead of oil, we would cut our consumption in HALF, and require only a single-digit percentage increase in electric capacity.
And by the way, I never mentioned the Hindenberg.