Whatd'ya think boys, shall we let 'em in?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: patriot_wes
I'm from BC. Trust me, you don't want 'em.
2 posted on
01/22/2005 1:43:03 PM PST by
Mr. Blond
To: patriot_wes
Whatd'ya think boys, shall we let 'em in? Maybe we could trade for them...How about Massachusetts?
4 posted on
01/22/2005 1:43:59 PM PST by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: patriot_wes
I think this would be alot more likely to work in one of the conservative western provinces. BC is more like the US west coast... it's likely to prefer canada.
5 posted on
01/22/2005 1:44:04 PM PST by
Betaille
(Harry Potter is a Right-Winger)
To: patriot_wes
Geez, BC is beautiful, but you'd have the same political problems you have with Washington -- leftists in Vancouver outgunning Conservatives in the interior. Wouldn't it work better with Alberta and Saskatchewan? Straight up trade for New England and a West Coast state to be named later.
6 posted on
01/22/2005 1:45:01 PM PST by
speedy
To: patriot_wes
As Much as I would like to see Alaska united with the mainland I would not want BC in the United States unless they left Vancouver as part of Canada.
7 posted on
01/22/2005 1:45:49 PM PST by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: patriot_wes
Whatd'ya think boys, shall we let 'em in?
They're liberals. Only if we get Alberta at the same time.
Like in the 1850's: one slave state, one free state.
To: patriot_wes
Perhaps just merge British Columbia with Alaska. That would allow Alaska to become one of them "continental" states..
10 posted on
01/22/2005 1:48:09 PM PST by
Experiment 6-2-6
(Meega, Nala Kweesta! It appears that SABERTOOTH got himself suspended. Again. ????)
To: patriot_wes
Kinda foggy on letting BC in BUT we(the US) should definatly let and encourage Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia to COME ON IN! They would be a REAL asset to the US as the 51, 52, 53 and 54 States.
11 posted on
01/22/2005 1:48:20 PM PST by
zzen01
To: patriot_wes
13 posted on
01/22/2005 1:49:00 PM PST by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: patriot_wes
When I was in graduate school in the 70s in Victoria it always surprised me to see Communists running for provincial posts, and they weren't necessarily considered "fringe".
16 posted on
01/22/2005 1:53:00 PM PST by
steve86
To: patriot_wes
2 more liberal Senators???
forget it....
dont want PR to be a state either fer the same reason.
17 posted on
01/22/2005 1:53:15 PM PST by
Vaquero
To: patriot_wes
It would have to be renamed.....No longer British Columbia...
How about Canookifornia,
or NoFrenchachusettes.
To: patriot_wes
Nope....Mexico already has first dibs on becoming the next state...Just most people don't understand the process yet....
21 posted on
01/22/2005 1:55:24 PM PST by
M-cubed
To: patriot_wes
Caveat emptor...
http://www.annexationbc.com/sitemap.asp
To: patriot_wes
Whatd'ya think boys, shall we let 'em in? Isn't 'HongCouver' the biggest city in BC?
We have enough problems w/o taking on some of Canada's.
26 posted on
01/22/2005 1:58:23 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
("My only regret in life is neither of my kids is gay." Sharon Osborn)
To: patriot_wes
Maybe a positive planck in party platform:
"There will no longer be a need to waste millions of business and tax dollars on the labeling and printing of French on everything manufactured and imported into BC. Compulsory French language education in our BC schools will be eliminated. "
How 'bout that?
To: patriot_wes
DOn't forget Alberta.
http://www.separationalberta.com/ A better question would be Why stay?
For almost 100 years, Alberta and the West have been trying to become real members of Canada and true, equal partners in Confederation. These efforts have proved fruitless. It is time to move forward and protect Albertas future. It is time to stop the financial and emotional drain caused by an incompetent, unresponsive political and bureaucratic nightmare called Ottawa.
Economic Cost of Federation for Alberta, 1961 Present
Alberta has, on a per capita basis, been Ottawas largest single contributor. For example, between 1961 and 1992, Alberta paid $139 billion more to Ottawa than it received back from Ottawa. That is what it cost Albertans to be Canadian. *
And where did the money go? During that time frame, the province of Quebec, despite its large population and vibrant economy, was a net recipient of over $ 168 billion from Ottawa. Alberta was paying Quebec to be Canadian. *
To: patriot_wes
42 posted on
01/22/2005 2:12:04 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: patriot_wes
Any move that would make Quebec even less relevant is OK by me.
46 posted on
01/22/2005 2:14:14 PM PST by
WestVirginiaRebel
("Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like.")
To: patriot_wes
The hell with that! They've got more hard-core muslim terrorists than Seattle, Portland and SF.
F*** BC, Fu** Canada. Let them die because of muslim terrorists, not us.
47 posted on
01/22/2005 2:14:47 PM PST by
sarah_f
(Know Islam, Know Terror.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson