1 posted on
01/22/2005 12:09:48 AM PST by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Mr. Naqvi contends that India's positive feelings toward Bush are the result of lack of exposure to global events. No, its India's exposure to Islamic terrorism, dummy.
2 posted on
01/22/2005 12:13:09 AM PST by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: ambrose
Pollster Doug Miller, president of GlobeScan, defends his polls results, saying they are consistent with other polls conducted over the past few years. So his poll is good when bad for Bush
But he admits that the sample of Indians who participated all came from such urban areas as Delhi, Bombay (Mumbai), Calcutta, and Madras (Chennai), a fact that might skew the findings somewhat
And not so good when good for Bush
America hater, DNC significant other health care endorser.
To: ambrose; B4Ranch
I can't understand why the world is so down on us when our elected leader has shown only the highest concern toward it.
To: ambrose
"...the global distrust-America trend - a phenomenon that largely resulted from America's 2003 decision to launch a preemptive war in Iraq without UN approval,..."
That's not true. The hate-America trend in Europe was just about as strong before the September attack. But then many of us know that the Christian Science Monitor is a hate-America publication.
5 posted on
01/22/2005 1:47:21 AM PST by
familyop
To: ambrose
And could it be that India realizes it's emerging global importance as a God-fearing alternative to China?
7 posted on
01/22/2005 6:27:53 AM PST by
GVnana
(If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson