Posted on 01/21/2005 11:01:49 AM PST by CrawDaddyCA
They can also be found and removed in seconds. Know your vehicle.
But that doesn't include just highway movement, does it? It tracks what private establishments one goes to... Heck, you could drive around for 3 days in a parking lot, never entering onto the public roads, and it would record that too.
That, and a huge potential for GPS detectors.
"Your movements on a highway aren't private"
So the only place you have an expectation of privacy is inside your own home apparently. Exactly how much better of are we than people under the old soviet system?. Oh I guess we still have our houses, thats right.
This is not the type of country in which I want to live!
Most intersections in my area have video cameras. Simply add license plate reading software, and they will know where most people are most of the time.
My thoughts exactly...Anyone with a GPS attached vehicle may drive that vehicle to where they should have a reasonable expectation of privacy...
Drive down to the truck stop remove device and attach it to a long haul truck heading out of town.
Yeah, no expectation of privacy, but he did expect the government not to tamper with his property.
Anyone carrying a cell phone can be tracked..
Look out for the "if you have nothing to hide" crowd. Those people will sell any freedom away.
Placing a device on a private vehicle without the owner's permission is not a violation of privacy? How about recording everything the driver says as he drives down the road. This judge is a very dangerous idiot.
"who said using the gadgets is virtually the same thing as following a car along a road."
The only difference being that if they actually want to follow a car on the road they have to use a vehicle and manpower to do it.
Now instead they can have someone attach a device that costs $60 to as many cars as they want and sit someone down at a pc to watch them.
This is very, very bad.
"Anyone carrying a cell phone can be tracked..
"
Not if it's powered off. I never turn mine on unless I'm making a call.
In this day and age, you also don't (or shouldn't) expect that you'd have an expectation of privacy on the phone or the internet, because in reality, you don't. Very slippery slope.
If you haven't done anything wrong, you don't have anything to fear
>/sarcasm
The devices that these cops are using must include some sort of transmitter. This is more like Lojack, or the combined GPS/cell-phone services provided by OnStar.
So I don't want stories like this to scare people away from heading to the store and picking up a standalone GPS navigation system, or ordering one (without OnStar) in their car. They're pretty cool and useful devices.
(As for cell phones with GPS built in---well, I don't know enough about them to know for sure how much of a privacy scare they are. But there is definitely potential for scariness there.)
Not if your windows are open. Police may also trespass on your property and conduct surveillance without a warrant.
Exactly how much better of are we than people under the old soviet system?.
The USSR Bill of Rights serves the same purpose as our Bill of Rights, to convince people they are free despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary.
Article 54. Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed inviolability of the person. No one may be arrested except by a court decision or on the warrant of a procurator.
Article 55. Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed inviolability of the home. No one may, without lawful grounds, enter a home against the will of those residing in it.
Article 56. The privacy of citizens, and of their correspondence, telephone conversations, and telegraphic communications is protected by law.
I don't know about suspect's cars, but I am getting one for my car when my daughter starts driving.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.