Number 7 should read: Do you think Karl Rove stole Ohio for Bush?
Giving it a quick scan I can see that I would be answering no almost exclusively.
I find it ironic that the same people who have always maintained that there is no objective reality, only a plurality of beliefs and perspectives, now declare themselves the arbriters of what constitutes reality and what doesn't. Of course, they still aren't any more evidence-based than they were before.
Most are no, but I know if I weren't allowed to sleep I'd feel tortured. Ask anyone who's been through BMT, they'll likely agree.
Would I cry a tear over it being done to a murderer or terrorist to get information? Not likely, but I will concede that it can be physically and psychologically painful.
Assuming you mean the war in Iraq, I would seperate "planned" from "preordained." I would trust the adults in charge of the military have "plans" for all types of invasion scenarios involving all types of countries.
#38 and 39 are essentially the same question.
SD
#22 & #32 are unknowns,no one knows what could happen in 4 years and as far as a coup goes, who knows at what lengths us crazy Freepers would go.
I'm a pretty staunch liberal and I had 7 "Yes" votes. I think you'd have to be a little deranged to get much higher than that.
THANKS.
You can be patriotic, believe that the US presence in Iraq is counterproductive, and want the occupation to end immediately. You cannot be patriotic and support the *tactics* of the "resistance".
20) In your opinion, was Iraq primarily a "war for oil"?
Well, if you go down the chain of reasoning far enough, our interest in the Middle East is mostly about oil, so in that sense yes is a plausible answer. Of course many liberals will take the more direct approach and claim that we went into Iraq solely to steal their oil and enrich Halliburton.
24) In your opinion, is sleep deprivation a form of torture?
Depending on the specifics, it can be.
40) Do you believe there's a significant chance that the US Government knows where Bin Laden is and is deliberately allowing him to remain free?
It's slightly possible that we know where OBL is and are not capturing him immediately so that we can monitor his communications and gain further intelligence. This is of course distinct from the moonbat theory that Bush is letting OBL remain at large in order to keep us scared of terrorists.
1-40, all no