1 posted on
01/18/2005 9:56:56 AM PST by
neverdem
To: neverdem
![](http://216.77.188.54/coDataImages/p/Groups/224/224535/folders/164132/1273085USA-09.gif)
To paraphrase Will Smith in I, Robot...
Somehow "I told you so" just doesn't suffice.
2 posted on
01/18/2005 9:58:19 AM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: neverdem
A law requiring Maryland State Police to collect ballistics information from each handgun sold in the state should be repealed because the expensive system is flawed and has not helped a criminal investigation since it was adopted in 2000, a state police report has concluded. BWAAAAHAAAHAHAhahahahahahahaaaaa!!!!!
3 posted on
01/18/2005 10:01:16 AM PST by
theDentist
(Jerry Springer: PBS for White Trash)
To: neverdem
When a bullet is fired, it is scratched with unique markings, or "fingerprints," as it passes through the gun's barrel. The law requires gun manufacturers to test-fire handguns and send a spent shell casing from each gun sold in Maryland to the state police.Well, there's the problem.
5 posted on
01/18/2005 10:09:16 AM PST by
MediaMole
To: neverdem
The ache in my rear is that the dolts who advocated this in 2000 will likely never be held accountable for the millions of taxpayer dollars pi$$ed away on this stupid idea.
6 posted on
01/18/2005 10:11:59 AM PST by
ko_kyi
To: neverdem
Well NO-SHIITE, you liberal, panty-waste, anti-gun, Peoples Republic of Maryland liberals! Yet ANOTHER waste of taxpayers dollars to support a flawed liberal anti-gun boondoggle. As usual, nothing but FEEL-GOOD legislation and "programs" from them. Not as bad as the BILLION dollar (Canadian) WASTE that is Canadian gun control, but bad enough, ESPECIALLY here, in the "land of the FREE".
8 posted on
01/18/2005 10:18:44 AM PST by
DocH
(Release ALL your Navy records AND your private journal Kerry!)
To: neverdem
--I eagerly await a Sixty Minutes expose' on this, which could perhaps be combined with one on the non-effectiveness of the assault weapons ban--
10 posted on
01/18/2005 10:33:31 AM PST by
rellimpank
(urban dwellers don' t understand the cultural deprivation of not being raised on a farm)
To: neverdem
Hmm, I wonder if the unique 'scratches and marks' on the first bullet fired from a new firearm match the ones on the 100th bullet, or 1,000th bullet fired?
</sarcasm>
15 posted on
01/18/2005 10:46:19 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
To: neverdem
"
When a bullet is fired, it is scratched with unique markings, or "fingerprints," as it passes through the gun's barrel. The law requires gun manufacturers to test-fire handguns and send a spent shell casing from each gun sold in Maryland to the state police."So what do they catalog, the bullet or the shell casing?
To: neverdem
While we're all getting a good chuckle at their foolishness these people are going to use this as an argument for banning guns altogether.
Because if you can't "properly" regulate them then you'll HAVE to ban them.
BTW - it's not as bad as one-time Sacramento City Councilmember Deborah Ortiz' (now a State Senator) brilliant idea to require the police department to develop technology to, no kidding, track the ballistic characteristics of *shotguns*. She pulled the idea after someone told her she was a laughing stock in certain circles at the SPD.
27 posted on
01/18/2005 1:23:16 PM PST by
PeterFinn
(The only thing I need to know about Islam is how to destroy it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson